
One of the performances I was most anticipating at Santa Fe this summer was Lili Elbe. I love modern opera, I come at my love of opera from the modern reaching backward. And yet, this opera was a disappointment. Not only that, I think my disappointment was amplified because the orchestral score itself was beautiful — lush, dynamic, moving. The most emotionally rich and moving scenes in this opera were the orchestral interludes, which included video projects of bodies shrouded in mist and longing. I love a good orchestral interlude, but it story progression seemed strangely off-kilter simply because the sung portions of the opera felt dry and clinical, as if the artists were reading a history book to music, sung in a flat, “just the facts, Ma’am” tone. I loved the score, I hated the opera, and I am incredibly sad because I saw so much potential in the story and the voices. I saw what could have been an emotionally powerful and moving opera, except that, for this audience member at least, none of this happened.
There is a moment in the opening scene, where Eimar and his wife Gerda are preparing to go out, when Eimar slips his jacket off his shoulder, and wraps his neck scarf loosely as if it were a shawl and briefly models in the mirror. But Gerda returns and he quickly sets himself to rights. This is the only instance in which we see any hint that Eimar had ever had conflicting feelings about his sexuality. The next thing we know is that Gerda’s model fails to appear and she asks Eimar to don a robe and model for her, so that she can finish the legs on her subject. In that moment, it appears as if Eimar, suddenly has this fully-fledged, unbidden insight that he is Lili. Gerda thinks he is playing a game; believes he is playing a game. There is no exploration of his transformation, no psychology, no emotion, and this is a great opportunity wasted. The situation is emotional, it is tragic, it is comic, it is rich with opportunity. It could be so powerful. What an opportunity lost.
In powerful, dueling arias, Eimar could explore fleeting feelings from his past, his own evolution of thought, and yes, even perhaps this sudden lightening-bolt insight. Gerda could explore her confusion, her budding recognition that her husband may not who she had assumed he was, and her own fears and longing to have her “old” husband back. But there are no arias in this opera, there is no true recitative. This could have been a watershed moment that carried the entire opera forward, an opportunity to launch this opera into a moving, perhaps even wrenching story of love, self-discovery, and identity.
There follow other scenes, a move to Paris, two parties, one in Denmark, one in Paris, encounters with family, doctor visits, hospitals. The transitions could have been alluded to more artfully. One party would have sufficed. But the momentum of this opera has been set in stone, by exposing every detail, the story itself feels like it has lost its weight.
The parties struck me as further lost opportunities. Everyone was beautifully dressed and great effort was made in costuming, with the apparent exception of Lili.

In the promotion photos, she does not appear so dowdy as she does from the hall, but to my eye, and to my companion’s, eye as well, Lili appeared to be dressed as a fusty old grandmother. It was difficult to see why all the men flocked around her.
The party scenes were not festive. The men congregated, but they could have been scientists discussing a new discovery for all I could tell. The story was told, Lili entered and stood. I found it difficult to understand the appeal. There was an opportunity for the men to explore the allure of this new attraction in song, opportunity for the women present to explore their own reactions, and an even greater opportunity for Lili to explore her own emotions and her perceptions to this new level of attention. Instead the scene felt flat.
In Paris, Claude Le Jeune falls immediately in love with Lili, but we have no inclining of why. Even in the Tuileries, we have some sense that Claude may suspect the truth, but this is hinted at so faintly, that I remained confused. Another opportunity lost, but how delicious it would be for the artists to explore these new, possibly conflicting feelings, how rich and enlightening the possibilities for drawing the audience into the story.
I wanted more.
The sets are dynamic and creative and beautiful. The costuming is exquisite. Possibly there were too many scenes, too many sets, as if factual detail was overemphasized at the cost of art. But it is art that brings emotional richness, art that allows us to experience new emotions and to understand feelings in new ways.
The videography is beautiful and emotionally rich. It could have been used more to forward the story. I felt there was too much of the doctor, too many scenes, too much literalism. The shock of the medical procedures might have been better handled by the excellent videographer, the doctor singing his own extended aria. There are times when reality is best alluded to obliquely, making the shock more powerful than the litany of facts, which dull the brain.
I expected the ending to be emotional and fragile. I knew that letters between Lili and Gerda would be involved, but for me the setting was too sterile, the words too mechanical. I am no romantic but it as I write it seems that this is what I am reaching for here. I think there could have been more nuance, more mystery, a sharper revelation between the emotion of the words, (shrouded in myst?) and the reality of the clinical setting. In my ideal ending, Gerda would have rushed into the mists to find Lili dead, only then with the mists fading and the sterile hospital room revealed.
I know this is not what the opera was imagined to be. But this was the opera I wanted. Somehow, because I so wanted more, my sense of loss and disappointment felt all the more intense. It is no fault of the singers, although I admit that I have never previously been to an opera where I wished the singing would just stop and the melody return.
And yet I wonder if there is more to my disconnect, a disconnect I have been struggling with in literature as well. Perhaps I am simply a literate old fuddy-duddy, a product of the 20th century, in a 21st century, post-literature world. I am a person who thinks in abstraction and ideas, who wants long, idea-rich sentences, perhaps long emotional arias, I also love metaphor and allegory but that is not because of the late 20th century world that shaped me but because of my years studying 16th and 17th century literature. Perhaps I have become an anachronism.
I think I need to study this opera further. With anything new, repeated exposure is a bonus. A recording has just been released. Perhaps my issues are more with the staging than the opera itself. Perhaps I also need to analyze my own approach. Worth further thinking, at any rate, even though my initial response is simply what it was.
I do hope that someday there is a beautiful, emotionally rich opera that explores of the experience of being in the wrong body, of transition, of being an outsider and discovering oneself. This is something that it seems to me that opera is perfectly suited to explore. Perhaps this opera is that opera. Perhaps it is not. Alas, that experience did not happen here, in this performance, to this member of the audience..
(note photos in this post are from the Santa Fe Opera House website)






































