Category: Books

  • February Books

    In February I finished off the Inspector Gamache series by Louise Penny. Well, almost. I haven't reread the most recent two novels, but I read them first, earlier last year; they were my introduction to Penny.  I will go back to them, perhaps this spring, perhaps during the summer, as I do want to read them again and finish off the sequence, this time in order.  I am certain to understand things I did not understand before, although the novels wee completely enjoyable, even out of sequence.  

    FebruaryBooks

    In fact, I think the novels are all readable more than once as I found them enjoyable on many levels, both for the writing, for the story, the character development, and for their insights into human nature and the struggles we all carry with us.  In that sense the books were also good companion pieces to both Anne Lamott's Hallelujah Anyway, which was a gift, a gift that has now been passed on to another reader, and Mark McIntosh's Mysteries of Faith.

     

    The Lamott book is a quick read.  I like Lamott and she has a way of getting at the essence of things in a friendly way, as if you are having a conversation with your neighbor down the street, except that instead of complaining about the neighbor's dog who barks all the time you are comparing notes on faith and life's journeys.  That said, although it is timely, it was not my favorite of Lamott's books; like that coffee conversation, although the points will probably resonate over time, the conversation itself is enjoyed in the moment and then quickly retreats into the babble of life, yes to bubble up occasionally, but otherwise happily subsumed in the stream.

     

    Mysteries of Faith is another kind of book altogether.  It is dense and thought-provoking.  This was the second time I read the book, and I enjoyed it more than during my first reading, early in 2017.  I liked the book then as well, but I also struggled.  The book is part of the year 4 curriculum for EFM and last year, in my year 4 group, I often felt like I was the only person in my group who enjoyed the book, who found it enlightening and thought-provoking.  I hate to admit that I felt embattled by other opinions, but I did.  This year I am a mentor, and I have read the book again, and this time, not needing to discuss it or defend it, I have been more free to delve into what the author is saying, and to explore my own beliefs and principles in the process, while also stepping back, listening to and hoping to mentor a new fourth-year group.  It is a book that rewards rereading, and I will look forward to future explorations.

     

    I wrote about Oliver Loving here.  I loved the book, I still love the book.  I probably will never read it again, unlike the books by Louise Penny.  That probably says more about me than about the book.  Both Oliver Loving, and the novels by Louise Penny say a lot about the times in which we live, in completely different ways, and for all that I think Oliver Loving is beautifully written, its focus is far too narrowly inward for me to want to delve into it again.

     

    Being Disciples is a set of six meditations or short essays.  It was interesting and yes, somewhat thought provoking.  The book was recommended reading for delegates to the  diocesan convention for the Episcopal Diocese of East Tennessee.  I have no other comments, I neither loved it nor disliked it, but I didn't mind reading it either; I did not find it to be one of William's most thought-provoking books.

     

    The New Jim Crow was thought provoking however.  The book is several years old, and I mostly read it because several people have asked me if I had read it.  I'm not sure I'm happy about it.  In some sense, there was nothing new in the book, but that could be as much because the book is no longer new, and much of the information in the book has been available through other sources.  That said, the author does pull everything together in a coherent, and yes, enlightening way, and it has helped me in my own understanding of our blindnesses and the way culture slowly warps our minds to accept circumstances that we would otherwise reject.  It ties in with books I have mentioned previously, where it seems to me that we need to radically change our way of thinking about ourselves and others.  

     

    And yet, I am not convinced I am the target audience for this book.  There are people whose passion is for social justice, and I support them wholeheartedly, and yet the older I get the more my focus seems drawn to a smaller. and smaller circle, not about me, but about individual relationships, small actions, the circle of the immediate.  Do I need to know about the greater world?  Of course.  Do I need to become an activist on a large scale? No. But I need to acknowledge, and accept the work of others, to help support an all-inclusive world.  The world needs all of us, the philosophers, the dreamers, the doers,  the marchers, the changers and the changed.  It is only in our conversation, our relationships, through listening to all the voices and learning to hear and move forward that change will actually occur, big and small alike.

     

     

  • Books Read 2017

    A little late to this, but mostly late to my own realization that I need this list and the process of going through last years books, has been cathartic.  I did better than I thought I did, at least in mentioning reading, although there are books I wish I had said more about.  

     

    But it also struck me that this was a useful memory exercise, and I recalled more about the books than I would have thought, at least as compared to a few years ago, when I felt unfocused.  Looking at the list and my blog posts, my notes and/or lack of them, helped me to focus on what I wanted to take from each book, and perhaps to see them from a different angle, the same way sometimes I marvel at things in my own neighborhood when Tikka and I walk but we go start off in the opposite direction from our normal route.  We see the same things, but they are also subtly different.

     

    Roughly in order read: 

    1. Mark McIntosh, Mysteries of Faith. 
    2. Fredrik Backman, A Man Called Ove.   Ultimately forgettable but I wanted to read it before seeing the movie with a friend. The book, as usual, was better than the movie.
    3. Cynthia Crysdale, Transformed Lives, Making Sense of Atonement Today
    4. Paulette Jiles, News of the World.  This book was mentioned in the post, but not discussed.  A year later I realize that I remember more about this novel than about the Ferrante.  Although I discussed the Ferrante at the time, ultimately it has not stuck with me as much as News of the World.
    5. Elena Ferrante, My Brilliant FriendAnd again, here. 
    6. Eimear McBride, The Lesser Bohemians.
    7. Tana French, In the Woods.
    8. Jan Werner Muller, What is Populism.
    9. Ann Patchett, Commonwealth.
    10. Brian Freemn, The Nightbird.
    11. Aravind Adiga, Selection Day: A Novel.
    12. Oliver Sacks, Grattitude.
    13. Jess Walter, The Financial Lives of the Poets.
    14. Ronald C. White, American Ulysses.
    15. Michael Dirda, Browsings: A Year of Reading, Collecting, and Living with Books.
    16. A. S. Byatt, Peacock and Vine.
    17. Dodie Smith, I capture the Castle.
    18. Paulette Jiles, The Color of Lightening
    19. Amor Towles, The Rules of Civility.
    20. Alan Roxburgh, Joining God, Remaking Church, Changing the World.  Actually, I mentioned this book but said nothing about it. The book was read for the Episcopal Diocese of East Tennessee's Diocesan Convention.  Interesting enough. Ultimately forgettable.
    21. Emma Donoghue, The Wonder.
    22. Nicole Mones, Lost in Translation.
    23. Gary Taubes, The Case Against Sugar.
    24. John Reed, Insurgent Mexico.
    25. John Reed, Ten Days that Shook the World.
    26. Eric Ripert, 32 Yolks.
    27. Fredrick Backman, And Every Morning the Way Home Gets Longer and Longer
    28. Paul Eckman, Why Kids Lie.
    29. Walter Isaacson, Einstein, His Life and Universe,
    30. Elizabeth Kostova, The Swan Thieves.
    31. Rachel Cusk, Outline: A Novel.
    32. Nujeen Mustafa, Nujeen, One Girl's Incredible Journey
    33. Claire-Louise Bennett, Pond.
    34. Adam Johnson, The Orphan Master's Son.
    35. George R. R. Martin,  A Game of Thrones.
    36. Stephen King, Mr. Mercedes.
    37. Jimin Han, A Small Revolution.
    38. Rachel Cusk, Transit: A Novel.
    39. Ilia Delio, Care for Creation.
    40. Stephen King, On Writing.
    41. Tyler Cowan, The Complacent Class.
    42. Betty Halbreich, I'll Drink to That.
    43. Tyler Cowan, An Economist Gets Lunch.
    44. Haruki Murakami, Men Without Women: Stories.
    45. Susan Hermann Loomis, On Rue Tatin.
    46. Domenico Starnone, Ties.
    47. Michael Connelly, The Lincoln Lawyer.
    48. Lior Lev Sercarz, The Spice Companion.
    49. David Foster Wallace, Consider the Lobster and Other Essays
    50. Julie Iromuanya, Mr. and Mrs. Doctor. and again, briefly, here.
    51. Timothy Sedgwick, The Christian Moral Life.
    52. Jennifer Howe Peace, My Neighbor's Faith.
    53. Laura Hillenbrand, Unbroken.
    54. George Saunders, Lincoln in the Bardo.
    55. Upton Sinclair, World's End.
    56. Michael Connelly, The Reversal.  I am "reading" most of these Michael Connelly books through Audible, so I am listening to them. They have proven to be good novels to listen to on long car trips.  I recognize that I might not enjoy them as much in a different context.
    57. Brenda Kinsel, Brenda Kinsel's Fashion Makeover.
    58. Knut Hamsen, Pan.
    59. Brenda Kinsel, Brenda's Wardrobe Companion.
    60. Amor Towles, A Gentleman in Moscow.
    61. Tressie McMillan Cottom, Lower Ed.
    62. Eula Biss, On Immunity: An Innoculation.
    63. Robert Gieselmann, The Episcopal Call to Love.
    64. Eula Biss, Notes from No Man's Land.
    65. Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens. 
    66. Gunnar Staalesen, Where Roses Never Die.
    67. Marcy Dermansky, The Red Car.
    68. George R. R. Martin, A Clash of Kings  and more here.
    69. Michael Connelly, The Late Show.
    70. Elisabeth Luard, Squirrel Pie.
    71. Owen David, Where the Water Goes: Life and Death Along the Colorado River.
    72. Paul Beatty, The Sellout.
    73. Cathy Barrow, Mrs. Wheelbarrow's Practical Pantry
    74. Emily Fridlund, History of Wolves: A Novel.
    75. Manjit Kumar, Quantum: Einstein, Bohr and the Great Debate About the Nature of Reality.
    76. Fiona Mosley, Elmet.
    77. Richard Adams, Watership Down.
    78.  Christopher Hayes, Twilight of the Elites.
    79. Karin Slaughter, The Good Daughter.
    80. Danielle Steele, The Award.
    81. Francine Prose, Reading Like a Writer.
    82. Sebastian Barry, Days Without End.
    83. Zadie Smith, Swing Time.
    84. Ali Smith, Autumn.. More here.
    85. Felicia Yap, Yesterday.
    86. Alyson Walsh, Know Your Style.
    87. Arundhati Roy, Ministry of Utmost Happiness. I simply stated that I did not like the book, which is true.  The writing is brilliant but I found it terribly difficult emotionally, worse because I found no enlightenment or redeeming sense of understanding in the book. I don't really regret reading it, but I won't read it again, and really can't recommend it.  Although beautiful, it could have been more effective and memorable if there were somehow more mercy.
    88. Louise Penny, Glass Houses: A Novel.
    89. J.D. Vance,  Hillbilly Elegy. This book is best at pointing out the incredible opportunistic and culture differences that divide the country, and not so good in politics or answers.  I read it again as part of a church related study, but I was disappointed that we did not delve deeper into the entire "us vs them" mentality that we displayed in class, and which Vance points out very clearly.  There is a lot of room for growth here, especially when combined with some other books about economic and cultural mores in today's American society.
    90. Louise Penny, Still Life.
    91. Debbie Macomber, If Not for You.
    92. Dennis R. Maynard, When Sheep Attack.
    93. Elizabeth Currid-Hackett, The Sum of Small Things. This really got under my skin, at least in forcing me to think about how much I am a  part fo my educational and economic cohort.  Disconcerting.  I'd like to read it again, along with Hillbilly Elegy, The Complacent Class, Twilight o the Elites and perhaps other book, as a part of a serious questioning of what we take for granted.
    94. Elizabeth Peters, Night Train to Memphis.
    95. Elizabeth Peters, Street of the Five Moons.
    96. Louise Penny, A Fatal Grace.
    97. Joshua Applestone, The Butcher's Guide to Well-Raised Meat.
    98. Cormac McCarthy, Suttree.
    99. Louise Penny, The Cruelest Month.
    100. Louise Penny, A Rule Against Murder.
    101. Louise Penny, The Brutal Telling.
    102. Mohsin Hamid, Exit West.
    103. Lee Child, Night School.
    104. Maryn McKenna, Big Chicken.
    105. Louise Penny, Bury Your Dead.
    106. David Ford: Theology: A Very Short Introduction.
    107. Paul Tillich, The Courage to Be.
    108. Holly Fitzgerald, Ruthless River: Love and Survival by Raft on the Amazon's Relentless Madre de Dios.  Tragedy averted (barely).  Truthfully I look at this and wonder about how naive, or outright stupid, people can be.  But then, I shouldn't say anything because I've done lots of things in my life that would give people ammunition to say exactly the same things.  It is a powerful story of love and survival, despite all odds.
    109. Rowan Williams, Being Christian. I felt this was a light fluff piece from someone who can be quite wise, theologically.  Hence I was somewhat disappointed.
    110. Atul Gawande, Being Mortal.

     

    So there you have it, the list.  I'm not sure what it says about me, but books, the books people keep, and the books people read, tend to say a lot about those people.  At the same time lists, like surfaces and first impressions are often misleading.  Make of it what you will.

  • A Book, A Rabbit, And Letting Go

    Once up a time there was a boy who fell through a crack in time, but the truth is that he didn't fall all the way.  Half of the boy remained there, on either side.

                                                                                            —Oliver Loving  page 284 

     

    A few nights ago Tikka went crazy barking at the window and running up and down the stairs, barking and barking and barking.  I couldn't fathom it. She often barks at people walking by.  She wants to go meet them, to go play, but this was different, and although I looked out the window, I didn't see anything that looked like pedestrians or even a car.  I calmed her down, shook my head, and put it out of my mind.

     

    In the morning Tikka and I took our walk.  We came home; she was desperate to crawl under the bushes at the front of the house, and I puzzled over this briefly, perhaps too briefly.  But I had places to be, other thoughts on my mind.  You know how it is, and yet you sense there was something else to know, something coming.  But it was not yet time.

     

    I have relinquished a lot of responsibilities.  Turned them over, not waiting, not acquiescing, not agreeing to serve until a replacement is found, because I've done that before, and I was still there.  I am closing a door I've needed to close for a long time in order to step through a new door but I still don't know which door was the hardest.   To let go of something that comes easily to me, and that I enjoy because I have a gift for it, even knowing that I needed to change, knowing that I needed to move into new territory, explore other gifts.  It is hard to let go of things you do well because the doing of them, even when they are not your heart, are not all of your gift or your passion, still offers security, and a known place in the world.  There is comfort in a secure place, even when you know it is the wrong place.   Likewise, it is hard to open doors into the unknown, even when we know that doorway leads to where we need to be.  Questions abound, and fear: fear of making a mistake, fear of failing, of being laughed at, fear of being forgotten.

     

    In the afternoon, after our walk, I let Tikka go, off her leash.  I needed to take the recycle can back to the garage, and Tikka always sits and waits for me at the front door.  But when I returned to the door something unexpected occurred.  Tikka was there, but she had something in her mouth.  It was the lower leg of a rabbit.  She was excited, barely able to contain her joy, and it was easy to startle her into relinquishing her prize.  Tikka safely ensconced inside, I went back out, gathered up the leg, and peered under the bush, where I found a lot of fluff and fur and signs of a scuffle.  The body had been carried away.

      LetMeIN

    There is an eagle in our neighborhood.  I see it occasionally perching in a high tree behind the house of my neighbor across the street. It has flown over us more than once; and I always pause in awe.  Another neighbor says he sees it, perched in a tree on his property, not 75 feet from his window.  I have no doubt that the unfortunate rabbit was making a run for it across my front lawn and didn't quite manage to reach safety.  I don't honestly know if a rabbit is too big for an eagle, although perhaps a small rabbit would be just right.  Or there was a larger hunter on the loose. I have no doubt that Tikka heard the scuffle.   And I am relieved that she was inside, that I did not let her out.

     

    By the next morning, when Moises wanted to go out, I was once again filled with doubts and questions, wanting to protect him, wanting to keep him close, but also acknowledging that this desire to hold tightly is ultimately more about me than Moises.  Moises is a cat.  He needs to be a cat.  And yet I worry.  

     

    Am I right to worry?  I am a cat mom.  Is that less than being a person mom?  I don't know.  I am a step-mom, and although I would never claim that I knew what it was like to be a mom, I too fretted and worried about those children of my heart, fretted when, as new drivers, they returned home late, fretted over boyfriends, marital spats, their hearts.  I have experienced that need to protect, that desire to tear someone limb from limb after they have hurt "my" child.  Giving birth doesn't make you a mom.  Believe me, I know women who have no maternal feeling, who feel the child they birthed was a parasite, sucking away their life; and some of those women were wise enough to give their children to someone who loved them, although some were not.  I cry for those children. And as I know that mothering is about more than giving birth, it is also about more than gender, or race, or perhaps even species.   

     

    But life is complicated.  And as much as we want to treasure and protect, and hold our loved ones close, we must also let them fledge.  Just as we must let the ones we love be free, we must also sometimes free ourselves of our preconceptions, our walls, and our understandings.  It is human to hold tight, to protect, to avoid pain.  And yet growth is, in and of itself a painful process.  When we hold tightly we don't actually avoid pain, we cause more pain, although we may not see it that way, for it is easy to blind ourselves to our own motivations, to begin the process of questioning and then return to the comfortable warmth of our own patterns.

      Hellebore

    I am closer to my 60th birthday than to my 59th.  It is time to open new doors.  I no longer have to prove myself to the world.  If I fall I know how to pick myself back up.  But if I don't try, I'll never know what I could have done.  So what if Moises has waited until he is 9 to want to go outside.  If he doesn't go, how will he ever know what he was looking for?  Yes, he may get hit by a car, but he is too big to be snatched by an eagle.  Whatever happens he will have been himself, and I will be honored to have known him, and I will mourn him whether he dies in his sleep, or in the jaws of a larger predator.  Whatever happens, winter always comes, and spring always follows.

     

    35343339These meditations have been partially fueled by a book I finished reading last week,  Oliver Loving by Stefan Morrell Block.  I can't say that it is an uplifting book, nor can I say that any of the characters in the book are very likable, but it is an excellent book, beautifully written, a story told with great empathy and humanity.  It could have been just another of-the-moment attempt to mess with your emotions, but it has proven to be more:  a school shooting, a dysfunctional family further broken by tragedy, in a broken, dysfunctional town.  These are not people I have known, and yet they are, although our circumstances have been different.  The author wends his way through his characters thoughts, and yes, the story is often repetitive, often mundane, just as our lives and our struggles are often mundane.   But I know these people; the father who retreats into his shed, into his alcohol; the mother who holds tightly to her idea of salvation through her children, children she needs to bolster a sense of self she never really developed; children who long to escape, only to learn that though they can distance themselves physically, actual escape involves more tools than they have in their pockets. 

     

    The story is about grief, about holding on and letting go, redemption, reconciliation.  Block writes complex, beguiling prose filled with humor, empathy and kindness as well clever repetitions of gradually evolving themes and phrases, and skillful use of foreshadowing and metaphor.  In all of this he reminds us that no story is ever what it seems, and yet neither is what we make it out to be when we let our fears run wild.  All the characters in this book, plunged as they are into their own private hells, are forced, over time, to examine themselves and their motivations, what they could have done differently, and all come up wanting at times, all are filled with remorse at times, and at times they all flee back into the comfort of their delusions. Occasionally however they see beyond their own narrow walls, see themselves for who they are, and try, if for a moment only, to become better than themselves, and in that moment there is hope.

     

    This is also a book about regrets, about assumptions, about the way we think we know the world, think we know what is going on around us, only to learn that we were blind, and that all our assumptions were incorrect.  Most of us will never experience the horror and sorrow around which this story is told, and yet we read about something similar almost weekly.  Or have we become inured?  Have we forgotten? Have we, like Eve, learned we "could narrow the radius of (our) concern to the body before (us)", (page 302), to that which only fits into our own personal world-view?

      Perspective

    As I looked out the window this morning, at the tree house at the edge of my backyard and the houses up on the next hill, I was reminded of this.  In the summer all of this is hidden by greenery.  I can hear the road below but cannot see it.  In winter I see through the trees, but the distance is deceiving, and in the photograph the perspective is even further distorted.  The house across the street is a long ways away, down into the valley and up a hill again.  It reminds me of how much of our judgements and our morals, our hopes and our fears even,  are situational and therefore political, are based on the world around us and the way the world in which we live shapes our assumptions, as well as our own need for certainty, our need to  believe that we are doing the right thing for the right reasons.  Even when we begin to examine our motivations, we may touch on the truth, but we often revert back to comfort.

     

    Every day I get up, I make my bed, and I get dressed.  I open the front door and Moises and Tikka go outside for their own morning rituals.  Up until that point, the point in which I open that door, I have control, or I am able to convince myself I have control.  After that, who knows?

  • January Books

     

    I go back and forth about posting book lists and those of you who have been patient readers have suffered through my angst.  But I realized something the other day, and that was that my lists, when I post them, are useful, and this blog, if it is to be maintained must be, among other things, useful.  That is, in a way, the reason I started blogging, as a way to keep a searchable record of the scribblings that were on paper and in notebooks, bits of paper that would eventually be discarded because I am very bad at holding on to things. In those days I didn't know there was such as thing as a blogging community, hadn't yet discovered the joys of friendships formed through words in the ether, and although those discoveries are their own reward, the truth is that I still need that more practical aspect of an internet journal as well.  

     

    It seems that the struggle then is not about the need for keeping a record, or posting such a record, but whether my random scribbles about the books I read are anything more than private scribbles.  In short it is a question of public vs private, and you dear readers get to suffer with me as I figure this out.  I know I'm not cut out for reviews, I don't really review books, and often my thoughts are a tangled path that only started with the book I read.  Nor am I particularly good at ratings or even "best" lists, even though I posted one in December.  What I do know, and apparently it is the only thing I know, is that I find the lists helpful, and I regret those times when my posts have not kept up with my readings.  And so I shall resume my bookish mutterings and flights of fancy. Sometime this month, the second month of the year, you will get an accounting of all the books I read last year, not because I have anything to prove but just because it helps me keep my own thoughts in order, and they are disordered enough as it is.

     

    So what did I read in January?  January was a difficult month for me in many ways, and that may be reflected in my reading.

    JanuaryBooks

    There were a couple of frivolous, light books, selected because I was either depressed or had a massive sinus headache and needed mindless escape.  Candace Bushnell's Killing Monica made my headache worse, and I probably wouldn't have finished it except that tossing it across the room took too much effort.   Laura Stampler's Little Black Dresses, Little White Lies was cute and charming, ultimately forgettable, but still a happy enough way to while away a few hours.  Lee Child's The Midnight Line was my New-Year's reading and I enjoyed it thoroughly.  After a few disappointing Reacher novels, this one reminded me of what I initially loved about the character, and I am more interested in Reacher's development, and often lack of it, than I am in the story itself. In fact the character is probably someone I wouldn't like, except that I tend to respect anyone who knows their own code and lives by it.  Lee Child's Jack Reacher lives by a code far stricter than most of us would tolerate, but it is his code and he sticks to it. 

     

    Donn Morgan's Fighting with the Bible was an interlude book for the EFM course I am mentoring, and I enjoyed reading it very much.  There were places where I felt his analogies fell a little flat, but overall the book made me think and I always like books that make me think, irregardless of whether or not I agree with the author.  I wished perhaps I had read the book earlier, during my own first year of EFM, and I like the way he describes the Bible, especially the Hebrew Bible or Old Testament, as a guidebook for how to live with disagreement and conflict.  If you live in a Western Culture, the Bible, in some sense or another has affected your history, your thought, and everything we understand about modern culture, whether you agree with it or not.  And we certainly have not used the Bible as a way to resolve conflict — more often we use it to create conflict — but that perhaps that says more about us than either the document itself, or the intentions of its authors, whose actual intentions we will never know.  I like the play on words, observed by another member of the group, not me, that we can fight with the Bible, ie. fight with the words trying to resolve some deeper conversation with humanity and human history, and we can also fight, using the Bible as a tool for conflict resolution.  We haven't done well with that so far.  But I'm a big one for hope.

     

    Corinne Ware's Discover Your Spiritual Type was also read in my capacity as an EFM mentor, although it is not specifically a part of the program.  It was part of a display of related interesting books in a training I took, and it related to reading we were doing at the time.  I found it very enlightening, and again wished I had read it earlier, it would have helped me during a recent period of difficulty.  But then again, perhaps it wouldn't have and I am grasping at straws.  Still, it has caused me to make some internal connections, some that did not seem initially obvious.  And whether one is religious or not, I continue to believe that all humans are spiritual; this spirituality, this seeking for greater meaning and a way to perpetuate it, is a significant factor in our humanity. We can be spiritual in different ways, just as we come in so many other diverse variations.  Why can't we accept the common thread that ties us together and embrace the different expressions of that thread, be they physical, mental, emotional or spiritual?  But I digress.  The book does not ask that question.

     

    Alan Bennett's Untold Stories is at times incredibly warm and human, especially in the initial section, where he describes his mother's mental illness, the dynamic between his parents, and the way that a young Bennett struggles through this period.  It is a great example of how an education can expand horizons and understanding but at the same time hamper empathy across what become major social and situational divides.  At other times the book was rather ho-hum and mundane, but I found it worth reading in snippets here and there.  It is not a good book to sit down and plow through cover-to-cover, but still I am happy to have requested it from the library, and happy to have returned it as well.

     

    My favorite book of the month was Louise Penny's A Trick of the Light.  Yes I still love these Inspector Gamache novels.  I love the character development and the way the story revolves around feelings and motives and the utter humanity of all involved.  There has been a lot of humanity in the last few novels, this one included. Many of the central characters have been struggling, some more successfully than others, a few having worked their way to a new understanding, others still lost.  In some ways this book revolves around the struggles of the human condition, and pain, and whether we rise or succumb;  around the nature of revelation or understanding and false hope, or "a trick of the light".  It is also about he way we build walls and hold on to small things that we think are the keys to happiness and peace, only to learn that we have mistaken safety for captivity, and that what we were seeking all along depended on our ability to change and grow with the world around us.  Or perhaps this was just my thought based on my state of mind.  

     

    I leave you with that question to ponder.  Do we see things that reflect our mood in the things we read out of serendipity, or divine intervention (I don't believe that), or do we find things around us that enlighten our state of mind simply because we are in that state of mind?  And does it matter?  Is it the road itself that matters, or the journey?

     

  • My Top Ten Books of 2017

    I read a lot in 2017, mostly before early November, after which life got complicated, I got adlepated, and I stopped reading. I'm reading again now, but I don't think my current reads will challenge this list.  Regardless of how much or how little I read, I'm not going to share the entire list with you anyway, merely my favorites.  Only two of these books were reviewed in any way on this blog, and there are links in their titles.  I am not offering reviews here, many are available, only a brief blurb, and,  because not all of those books were published this year, and a couple have even been reread (gasp!), this list can in no way be construed as a list of the "best" books of the year.

     

    FICTION

    I read a lot of fiction this year, and loved a lot of it as well.  But upon perusing the list, I see that only a few really stood out above the rest (in alphabetical order):

     

    Autumn, by Ali Smith is a beautifully and playfully written novel set in a post-Brexit Britain. Smith manages to tell an uplifting story enmeshed in a setting that could be ponderous, but here balances beauty and humanity with the dangers of nationalism, populism, and easy answers.

     

    Exit West, by Mohsin Hamid. This beautiful novel, is one of my favorites of the year.  In fact it is tied with The Sellout for second place even though it is radically different, beautifully written, eloquent in its kindness and its understanding of humanity and relationships and the idea that we are all immigrants through life.  

     

    Lincoln in the Bardo, by George Saunders. My favorite novel of the year is far more than the sum of its parts, which seems to be a theme for me this year. Not easy going, but rewarding. Click through for my review..

     

    The Sellout by Paul Beatty.  I can't say it was the easiest read as it challenged all of my cultural assumptions and yet it did so while simultaneously drawing me into the story.  Extremely satiric, at times difficult, as well as  hysterically funny, this book changed the way I see myself and the world in which I live. All that, and I would read it again.

     

    Ties, by Domenico Starnone.  The novel is short, compelling, and something of an emotional rollercoaster.  Long before the end however you begin to see that things are not what we initially perceive them to be and that life itself is a complex web of ties, ties that both hold us together and pull us apart.

     

    NON-FICTION

    I read less non fiction than fiction but had trouble finding 5 favorites. Once again in alphabetical order.

     

    American Ulysses by Ronald C. White. I've long been a fan of Grant, since I read his memoirs at least, memoirs that revealed him to be a thoughtful, often wise, and complex man.  I'm inclined to think he has unfairly been given short shrift, and although this book may be overly positive, I hope it gives more people a chance to reconsider.

     

    Being Mortal by Atul Gawande. Everyone's favorite book in the previous couple of years, I came to this book a little late.  There is little I can say that hasn't already been said. Life, illnesses, medicine, and what truly matters.  If you haven't read it, you must.

     

    Courage to Be by Paul Tillich. I loved Tillich when I was in college, studying philosophy of religion, and I suppose I still do.  It is admittedly dense stuff. As I've grown older I appreciate Kierkegaard more and think Tillich is heavy-handed in his analysis, but still profoundly wise.  This was either my fourth of fifth reading of this book, and I continue to changed by each engagement.

     

    Gratitude, by Oliver Sacks.  Beautiful and beautifully human short essays by Sacks written during the time leading up to his death. Sacks' essays have much to teach us about gratitude and embracing life in all its aspects, even in approaching death.

     

    On Immunity by Eula Biss.  The author takes the vaccination debate as a jumping off point for thoughtful and beautifully written essays about culture, parenthood, and what it means to be human.

  • October Reading

    For the most part, my October reading was mosty light and fun,..  

    OctoberBooks

    The Elizabeth Peters was read on the flight home from Scotland, and discarded.  The 2nd Louise Penny, A Fatal Grace, was read on the same flight and not discarded.  I've enjoyed reading the Gamache novels.  I find them charming and entertaining, and yet they always also trigger my reflective instincts; they form a nice balance between something I just simply enjoy for its own sake, like eating a really good meal, and yes the descriptions of food help, as do the personal relationships formed between Inspector Gamache and the Three Pines Community,  while at the same time satisfying some elemental craving for something more.

     

    Cormac McCarthy's novel, Suttree, was the most difficult novel I read. It may, in fact, be too sophisticated for me.  The prose and the simultaneously wry and achingly sad portrayals of citizens on the margins of society were powerful and occasionally wrenchingly beautiful, but I struggled with the straightforward story line which was at times seemed lacking in narrative complexity, treading as it was some intellectual and moral space between autobiography and fiction.  Perhaps I just wanted more of a "read, read", more Gamache, a change of voice, but something I could still curl up and get lost in.  Suttree did not really offer that kind of enveloping narrative, but what it does offer is something that I believe reveals insight into McCarthy's later novels, and may in fact be the kind of novel that reveals itself slowly, opening new vistas with each reading.

     

    The novel I enjoyed the most was Mohsin Hamid's Exit West; in fact I enjoyed it so much I read it twice. It is, in some ways, an odd little novel, told in a third person that puts the reader at some remove from the characters, and yet dealing simultaneously with struggles that are quite current and also quite personal.  At times, one perhaps wishes for a deeper emotional connection, and yet at the same time I think it is the absence of that connection that elevates the book into an almost allegorical state of reflection, a state that is enhanced in my opinion by Hamid's technique of using magical doors to replace the struggle of actual immigration.  He does this well, making the movement transitional in a way that reflects on more than just changes in physical space, mixing allegory with a story that is simply good, and engaging on its own merits.  Hamid challenges our preconceptions and reminds us that loss and change are part of the human condition, that we are all migrants, all find ourselves in places not of our choosing with no understanding of what will unfold.  Exactly through his prose, his scattered snapshots of a changing world superimposed on a story of a young couple as they move through massive change, the shared distance and tenderness he uses in his characterizations, Hamid is sharing with us the way “loss unites humanity, unites every human being, the temporary nature of our being-ness, and our shared sorrow, the heartache we each carry and yet too often refuse to acknowledge in one another.”  It is a book both melancholy and filled with hope.  

     

    I reread Joshua Applestone's Butcher's Guide to Well Raised Meats when I returned from Scotland.  Applestone was once my local butcher, and I had originally read the book when it was published.  I reread it because I returned from Scotland wanting eggs with the deep orange yolks and firm thick whites like I had in Scotland, and which I still missed from my farmer in Hyde Park.  But while thinking about eggs, I also realized another farmer I had supported was closing and I needed to rethink and review my meat choices as well.  Thank goodness there are still farmers I love to support, but I need to also explore more options. I have not made much progress on that particular mission, and local farmer's markets will soon close for the season, but it is an ongoing process.    I'm currently in the middle of reading Big Chicken, on Lisa's recommendation, and that may add some refinements to my choices as well, but I haven't yet read enough of the book to access how it will affect my search. But of course I am biased anyway.  I want food that is humanely raised, and sustainable, and has good flavor, feeling it is better to pay more and eat less of something truly satisfying, a desire that also aligns well with my increasingly strong opinion that whenever we think we can get more for less we are bargaining with the devil. 

     

     

     

     

  • Quiet

    Not my words, but in my heart nonetheless.

    Quiet

    The sky a deadbolt slid firmly

    into place. The earth is lonely:

    a dog barks its head off, trapped

    in the slow afternoon. When he gives up

    the silence is another lock on the door.

     

    The heart pushes on us like a stone

    no one can lift. We want so much

    from this life but can only glimpse it.

    We wander from room to echoing room, 

    always only the surface of what we seek:

    smoke rising through the floorboards, the faint

    perfume of the earth burning, deep in the well of itself.

    That something we have never seen affects us so completely:

    We are the healed skin of its molten core.

     

     

    Quiet by Sue Sinclair, in Breaker (Brick Books, London, Ontario 2008)

    Photo is from the garden at the McNay Museum, San Antonio Texas.

     

  • Obsession …. Satisfaction

    When I was younger I would deal with stress by baking.  I baked cookies and brownies and cakes for my dorm during exam week.  I still like to cook, and it is a way to distract my swirling thoughts and feel like I am doing something creative, but I no longer have a dorm full of hungry mouths to feed.

     

    I suppose it was not the cooking itself that calmed my nerves, but the act of doing something that was both creative and occupied my thoughts.  Later, sewing often filled that space, or other projects, but there was a slight delay in setting up the sewing room, a glitch, hopefully now corrected, and other kinds of projects can work equally well. 

     

    Last week that project was weeding out cookbooks.   It was not a new idea, but previously the energy required to sort and eliminate seemed daunting. Better to shut the door on the problem and pretend it wasn't there.   Something changed last week; more likely I just needed some short term project to obsess over for a couple of days.  I think my initial goal was to reduce the collection by ten percent or so, but the more I got involved in the project the easier it became.  I began to see a pattern, a pattern which made it easier to sort books.  Although I like books with good recipes, in the end that is not what attracts me.  I want to learn something, imagine something, be inspired.  Those things can come in many different forms:  inspiration, imagination, education.  But they are all important.  I have books I love that I will never cook from directly, yet they have indelibly changed the way I cook. I'll use a book heavily for a while then abandon it only to rediscover it later.  I am not even-keeled, never have been, not steady and constant.   

    Cookbooks

    In the end I managed to eliminate twenty-five percent of the cookbooks.  There had been books on the floor, and at least one of those spaces will be used for tall pots and small appliances.  I'll probably move larger books to the floor on the other side, as they are too heavy for the thin shelves that are there now, although these cabinets will be redone at some point in the future.  That will leave me some additional pantry room.  All the cabinets in this house are not full, but there are a few items that would be more easily accessed here than where they are currently stored.  That seems to be the hardest thing about settling in:  arranging and rearranging.  But perhaps that is just me.  Years ago, I would ask George why something was stored in a particular place, usually a place that seemed inconvenient or odd to me.  The answer inevitably was "because that is where we put it the day we moved in (6 years previously).  I don't understand; I've never understood.

     

    I took the first group of cookbooks to McKay's to sell on Friday.  While I was waiting for my number to be called, I remembered that the Man Booker shortlist had been announced and looked it up.  I was thrilled to see that, of the mere seven books I have read, my four favorites made the list, and the three I did not think should make the list were not there.  If you read my last post, you know which two are my favorites.

    Man booker

     Before I started project cookbook reduction, I had hoped to start Paul Auster's 4321 this weekend.  Yet I struggled.  Auster's recent novels have not been my favorites, and I wondered if I needed something I knew I could look forward to after just having finished Zadie Smith, an excellent writer in whose work I find no pleasure. I had also read Arundhati Roy's Ministry of Utmost Happiness, and found it disappointing, or perhaps it was just my expectations, just that I expected to find it as poetic as I had found The God of Small Things.  It may have been a difficult plan, as when Auster is good, he is very very good, and when he is bad he is atrocious, at least in my experience.  In short I either love his books or hate them, with little middle ground.  

     

    Perhaps I was feeling cautious.  Perhaps I was really yearning for  some middle ground. 

     

    Glass HousesWhile I was perusing the stacks, I found Louise Penney's new novel, Glass Houses, and took it home with some of the proceeds of my cookbook sales.    When I finished sorting and shifting books I curled up with Penney instead of Auster.  I have no complaints; it was exactly what I needed to read this weekend.

     

    But this brief interlude is over, and responsibilities mount.  My window of opportunity to get myself pulled into a huge novel may have passed until the middle of next month.  We will see.

     

     

    (Man Booker Short List Photo from NPR, here)

  • Food for Thought and Thoughts about Food and Cooking: August Books

    Very little reading was done during the last few days of August.  In fact, none, despite the fact that I piled books up around my reclining chair.  The books mostly acted as a supporting table for a box of kleenex while I watched tv or dozed.  Rather than books, my companions were average but entertaining movies and all three seasons of Grace and Frankie.

     

    DaysThe last book I started was Days Without End by Sebastian Barry, but, although the novel is incredibly poignant, and beautifully written, the opening sections of the novel were, in fact, too slowly meandering and lyrical for my sinus congested brain to latch onto.  Luckily, it is also a book that is easy to put down and equally easy to pick up later, even a week later.

     

    In many ways the book unfolds the way a life unfolds, the way the American prairie unfolds.  In that it is a uniquely American novel, although the time and the place are captured in a way that perhaps no modern American could, suffused as we are with our own history, our own sense of being American.  Of course we have to remember that "America" as experienced by McNulty and John Cole is itself a more elusive concept than the more defined nationalism we carry today.  The book is unflinching in the brutality that occurs, but also equally open-handed with love and community building, in its tenderness, yes, its tenderness.  The writing is deceptively simple, and although the book is at times shocking, what might be most important about this story is what is not said, or more exactly the way it is not said.  This is the story of one man's journey.  It deals with his life, with the complexity of what it means to be human, and with the dangers of seeing people as the other, with gender fluidity, with race, poverty, and love. And yet the novel doesn't actually address any of these things and this may be its greatest strength, the way it seeps under you skin — subtly, quietly, and with humanity.

     

    Days Without End is the fourth of the books listed for the Man Booker Prize that I have read.  (Elmet and History of Wolves, here)(Lincoln in the Bardo, here)  I read more novels than anything else in August, and that makes me very happy.  Although I can't bring myself to read novels exclusively, my mind is too peripatetic for that, I am happiest when my reading is more heavily weighted toward fiction as opposed to non-fiction.  Of the novels I read in August, ElmetWhere Roses Never Die, and Karin Slaughter's The Good Daughter were the ones I most enjoyed reading.  Slaughter is another author who is new to me, but then the genre is something I have only recently begun to explore as well.  It is a good story and with excellent and gentle development of deeply flawed and traumatized characters. 

    AugustBooks

    On other fronts, I read two cookbooks although I didn't cook from either of them.  Squirrel Pie is about food traditions and the way those traditions reflect their cutlures.  There are recipes I may cook someday but that really isn't why I love the book.  Mrs. Wheelbarrow's Practical Pantry, is about preserving food and I loved reading it although I haven't cooked anything from it either. 

     

    Years ago, in what feels like a former life, I used to make jams and preserves, chutneys,  pickles, vinegars and syrups.  I look back on that self now and think I had much energy.  And yet, I'd still like to think that I might again preserve some of my food.  I like the idea of preserving the best of what is local, the idea of making.  Even though the act of canning, drying, preserving in any way is not the simplest thing to do in any modern sense, in any sense in a world where it is easy to jump in a car and buy almost anything, in my mind it ties to something simpler, to being more connected to what fuels us and drives our lives. 

     

    I do make kimchi and sauerkraut. I make the occasional pickle.  I ate some fabulous kohlrabi pickles with my lunch yesterday.  I put them up last fall when I had a glut of habanero chiles.  After the initial fermentation the pickles were hot and spicy, now they still have a little echo of that habanero heat, but the fruitiness of the pepper is more evident.  I find this evolution, the process of fermentation and change, fascinating.  Increasingly I also want the deliberate slowness and connection that I see as the promise of this book.  It speaks of the simplicity of taking some sense of ownership in what is essential to our own lives, and what is in fact essential to life itself, not to our man-made world but to the world in which our cells and bodies, our food belong.  In my mind, this book is filled with promise. 

      Kohlrabi

    Or perhaps it is not really the book itself, merely that it acts as a jumping off point for my own thoughts.  Much as I think about connection to the earth, I am not about to ditch civilization and move to a parcel of land and attempt to live off the grid.  That is not me.  Instead I am thinking about a new stove.  I do not like my current stove.  I loved the induction cooktop at my former house.   I had far more control over temperature and heat with it than I do with my current Jenn-Air stove.  I realize that this is the fault of the stove, which is old, not the fact that it is gas.  And although I also realize that learning to cook on gas is itself a process, my mother's gas stove (Kenmore?) is far more useable than this, fancier, stove in my new house.  

     

    All my adult life I wanted a gas stove.  I couldn't have it in Hyde Park, not without completely gutting half the house and starting over.  The kitchen was in the middle of the house and building codes forbad gas in that circumstance; besides bringing the gas line down from the street would have involved blasting through hundreds of feet of rock.  And yet I have never had as much meticulous control over heat as I had on my induction cooktop in the Moss Creek House.   What do I want? If I get an induction cooktop, I would have to use an electric water bath canner, and could not use a pressure canner, since they are not made for induction.  Canners really shouldn't be used on glass cooking surfaces anyway.  Realistically speaking, will I ever use a canner? Or is this just some idle dream? An obscure dream is no reason to make a decision, and yet the sorting out of dreams is part of the process, my process at least.

     

    Did I tell you that I'm the kind of person who will mull over this decision for some time?  Even when I seem to make snap decisions, extensive background mulling and fretting has been swirling about beneath the surface. There is plenty of time.  In the meantime, my current stove and I are slowly defining the terms of a truce.

     

     

     

  • Creator of Radical Compassion

    That is who I'd like to be when I grow up, a creator of radical compassion.  The idea actually came from one of those Facebook memes, perhaps the one titled "what's your solar eclipse identity?  It is all frivoulous, and meaningless,  and yet the idea resonates simply I yearn to see more compassion in the world.  I don't think I could ever quite measure up, but its one hell of a goal to strive for.  Perhaps I need to make a sign above my desk, embroider or needlepoint something, just to remind me, especially on those days I am tired or stressed, days I all too often need reminding of good goals.

      WarMother

    This summer has been a summer of questioning for me, and I certainly don't have any answers.  Perhaps that little internet meme resonates because it seems that I haven't really seen a lot of compassion, and that is exactly the kind of thing I fret about. And this sense of things falling apart, of a loss of compassion, of concern for each other, is not unique to me. It has been a year of hard questions in many ways for many of us.  To some extent the upset revolves around change and the fear of the unknown.  We live in a world that changes rapidly, that has changed rapidly even since I was a child, and I suspect many fears are rooted there, rooted before my memories even began.  But the fear reproduces itself.  As we see the world becoming more uncertain, we cling to our own "certainties" more tightly and the entire cycle perpetuates itself, growing in on itself.   

     

    But the thing is, we change all the time.  The world changes, and yet it doesn't.  Our bodies change daily, replacing old cells with new cells and if we didn't change we would die.  Sometimes we hold on to things tightly, thinking there is security in that, but more likely by the time we grab hold of it, what we seek is already past, we have already lost it.

     

    QuantumI was reading Manjit Kumar's book about Einstein and Bohr, Quantum and, although the science and the biographies were interesting, the part of the book that struck me most forcefully this particular summer came near the end when the author was writing  about the fundamental disagreement between Einstein and Bohr, and the energy surrounding that disagreement. According to Kumar, this battle was perceived, at least by some, if not many, as the old guard struggling against the young guns, or the seemingly eternal war between comfortable truths as opposed to new insights. But, that idea was really missing the crux of the question, at least as Einstein apparently perceived it.  (It is more than possible I misunderstand).  Others felt that Einstein had grown settled and could not accept the new idea of quantum mechanics as opposed to classical physics.  But I got the impression the author was telling us that the inverse was true, Einstein felt Bohr and his peers were still defining quantum mechanics in relation to classical physics, they still used classical physics as an underlying frame of reference.  Einstein felt the question wasn't classical physics OR quantum mechanics at all,  If my understanding is correct, he felt the entire frame of reference was wrong, that there had to be something else that no one understood (yet) (if ever) a frame of reference that would include both. 

     
    But don't we always do this?  We make decisions and judgements, often on little information, on fleeting perceptions, and those are based on our own biases: our own history, what the world has taught each of us, and our own confidence that our perceptions are universal when they aren't.  If we don't question, are we not trapped in an endless circle? If my understanding of what Einstein was saying is correct, what appears conservative could actually be radically liberal, and what appears progressive could be regressive.  What appears safe and secure could be a trap, like the trap the rabbits find in Watership Down, when they learn they have been lured into what at first appeared to be a safe haven and later proved to be a trap.  But the trick is, the rabbits knew something was off, they had that uncomfortable feeling of something being not quite right, but they were tired, and so wanted security, that they ignored all the signs.

     

    I've started working my way through the Man Booker long list, not in a particularly organized fashion, just randomly with diversions, and my reading has served to fuel my generally wandering mind and occasionally clarify my thoughts.  But of course reading always does that, and novels in particular, if they are good, teach us much about ourselves, and about compassion, that we cannot necessarily learn unless we can escape from our own brittle shells.  But what I learn today may not be what I learn from the same book tomorrow, as reading, in some ways like life itself, is a relationship, constantly evolving (changing)(damn! there it is again).

     

    SelloutBut before I started this year's books, I read last year's winner, Paul Beatty's novel The Sellout.  The truth is that I struggled with this novel initially.  It is written from a point of view, from a knowledge of an aspect of culture with which I am both completely unfamiliar and fairly uncomfortable, and I found it quite difficult.  This doesn't mean that the novel isn't brilliant, it is, and it is brilliantly satiric, which of course explains a lot.  If satire doesn't make us squirm in our seats, almost make our skins crawl, it is not doing its job.  The Sellout does all this, and at the same time it makes the reader dig deeply into his or her own assumptions about race and culture and society, about what is the good fight, and what is not.  I came out of this novel rethinking much of what I had previously held to be true.  I read the novel before I read Quantum, but I realized in retrospect that the same question was being raised.  What if our entire frame of reference is wrong?  Where do we go from here?  And how do we take as many people with us as possible?

     
      ElmetI just finished reading Fiona Mozley's Elmet, a beautifully written and haunting book.  Mosley's prose is so finely wrought, so poetic, and the conceit of Elmet, of the world of the copse where our characters live, almost outside of time and space, with the haunting overlays of timelessness and the intrusions of time, is beautifully rendered.  In fact it is so beautifully drawn that the purely unadulterated visceral shock of the violence feels unanticipated, even though it has, in fact, been clear from the very opening lines that it is coming.  Thus the author captures the seductions of life, of the stories we tell ourselves, of the innocence of children, and there are children here, children who are both wise, in the uncanny ways children on the cusp of adulthood can be, and yet also innocent in a way that we can barely imagine as adults.  The story itself is beautiful, and thoughtful, highlighting wisdom and innocence and blindness, the way we are often all blind, the way we often make judgements and assumptions without really knowing either ourselves or the world which we are judging, and in the same way we are also innocent in that we rarely know the truth, and that which we are judged for often has nothing, or very little, to do with the way we see ourselves.

     

    WolvesBetween The Sellout and Elmet, I read  Emily Fridlund's History of Wolves.  Both  Mozley's and Fridlund's books are, on one level, coming of age novels, although in radically different places and with radically different outcomes, and yet there are common threads.  Both narrators are looking back on an episode that changed their young lives,  Both narrators exist on the fringes of their respective cultures, and although they are aware they are outsiders they are not yet mature enough to understand why they are outsiders.  The insiders are often blind to their own motivations and guilt as well, as we all are, defining those who are different as "other" and then somehow being shocked when the other doesn't understand the rules and expectations that have been placed on them, even though no one has bothered to teach them those rules. 

     

    As for me, I don't really know what I think about these books yet, just as I don't know what I think about the general unrest that has plagued me.  I think, in these novels, that people expect too much, and I think we do as well. I see expectations that are somehow disconnected from the realities portrayed. In both of these books, and in life as I have perceived it this summer, I see a world in which the discomfort is there, but is not addressed, because we would rather not address it.  Actually it is more than that, more like a denial of reality, of difference, of expecting that everyone will know what we expect because we assume that the world is like us, and, because we assume our knowledge is common knowledge, we can absolve ourselves of responsibility and blame the other.  But life isn't really like this.  And responsibility is always shared. 

     

    In Fridlund's book a fifteen year girl who obviously lives a mostly solitary life, already on the fringes of her society, is expected to suddenly have the wisdom of a fully educated and integrated adult.  She is expected to have seen and understood what the adults themselves did not see or understand, or perhaps did not want to see or understand.  In Elmet, well in Elmet, there are multiple layers of misunderstanding, topmultiple levels of denial, Mozley manages to create a world that seems completely unlike our own while at the same time capturing a level of dysfunction and denial that is probably closer to our own lives than we would comfortably like to admit.  In all four of these novels, the implications of both action and inaction ripple out in overlapping circles, becoming something beyond control, something far greater than was intended or imagined.

     

    Do you see the link? Why compassion weighs so heavily on my mind? We need compassion.  We need compassion for ourselves and for others. Because it seems to me that without compassion, the things we haven't done would damn us far more than the things we have done.  And in that, at least, we are each and every one of us, alike.

     

     top photo: War Mother by Charles Umlauf.  Photo taken at the McNay Museum of Art, San Antonio, Texas.