Restingmotion

  • Liszt and His World, Weekend 1

    FranzlisztI must admit that I approached The Bard Music Festival with a bit of apprehension this year, if not outright caution.  It is not that I dislike Liszt, but more that I was not convinced that there is enough Liszt around which to shape a music festival.  I also must admit that although I enjoy listening to Liszt’s piano works, I am not convinced that he commands the same place in the musical firmament as the likes of Brahms, Haydn, and Shostakovich.

    And so, at the end of weekend #1, I can say that I have been surprised and yet also justified in some of my pre-conceived notions.  Leon Botstein, in his opening address stated that Liszt was a highly innovative and influential composer in his day, as well as a virtuoso performer, and that he was, indeed, far more than a pretty face.  But his works have become neglected.  At the end of the weekend I can only say, that to some of extent the neglect is justified, but perhaps not the dismissal.

    This is not to say that I did not enjoy the concerts.  The entire weekend was enjoyable and there were fabulous moments.  The opening concert thrilled and promised interesting discoveries to come.  The first piece, Réminiscences of Don Juan, was a spectacularly dramatic opening to the weekend, highlighting the characteristics of Liszt with which we are all familiar, the dramatic, preening virtuoso.  An incredibly difficult and virtuosic piece, it was spectacularly performed by Valentina Lisitsa to tremendous applause. 

    But then the opening concert moved on to the lesser known Liszt, the list who wrote incredibly beautiful songs such as Die Lorelei, which in a performance by Nicole Cabell, could stop the heart and bring tears to the eyes.  Also performed were the simple choral works written by the late Liszt, Liszt the Abbé and these songs, such as the benedictus were incredibly affecting. 

    So there were surprises.  But for the most part they were few and far between.

    The programs were lovely.  There were many performances of mostly lovely but uninspiring works by very good but uninspiring performers.  It seems it is difficult, if one goes to many concerts, not in the end to become a critic of sorts, and this is a subject that is brought more to mind in a program that is as much about performance and virtuosity as it is about the writing of music. And this to me is the difficult thing.  There were many excellent pianists, who are technically extraordinary but in the end the performance is unmemorable.  I know that the level of competence in conservatories has increased phenomenally in my lifetime.  But what makes a virtuoso, a performer who makes your heart sing when they command the keys?  I cannot explain this.  One cannot expect that every concert will change one’s life, and the pleasure of hearing music, although dependent on the skill of the musician, does not require transformation.  The Scientific American magazine ran an article last month on what it takes to become an expert and I am sure this applies to expert pianists as well.  But what does it take to make the transition from outstanding pianist, from being an expert, to being a true artist?  I know that, for me in this first weekend, that only moment of transfiguration came during the Saturday evening concert, when Arnaldo Cohen performed Liszt’s Piano Concerto #2 a performance filled with bravado and virtuosity as well as quite reflective sensitivity.  It haunts my memory. 

    The remainder of that Saturday Evening concert was less memorable.  Liszt’s symphonic works left me cold, although the orchestra itself performed beautifully.  Liszt may have been important for developing the symphonic poem but later composers mastered the idea.  The only other bright spot of that evening was when the violinist Alexander Markov played Heinrich Ernst’s Concerto Pathetique in F Sharp Minor.  Even G, who tends not to be particularly fond of solo violin was thrilled.  No matter how much I admired that performance however, I was far more carried away with the same Mr. Markov’s performance on Sunday afternoon, when he performed selections from Paganini’s 24 Caprices.  Judging from the applause, I would say I was not the only one who fell under his spell.  None of the variations on this work, which followed Mr. Markov’s performance, had any of the pure breathtaking beauty of that which we had just heard.

    Which brings me back to the pianists.  Any program about Liszt must have piano music and there was a great deal of it.  I love piano music; I always have.  And there was a string of stupendously competent pianists, technically very good, but not brilliant.   Some of the pianists sat and played the piano wonderfully, performed difficult pieces with aplomb, but they were just competent people playing the piano.  Others commanded the piano, made it theirs with the first touch, but still, in the end there was nothing special.  On Saturday I would have to say the prize went to Michael Abramovich who played a piece titled le Vent by Charles-Valentin Alkan with elegance and finesse, the wind transformed into music was breathtaking.

    But overall the pianists were less memorable.  Janice Weber is technically excellent.  Peter Orth is very good.  I love watching Martin Kasick’s expression as he plays. But they were in the end unmemorable performances of unmemorable works.  Oddly what sticks in my mind most about the afternoon concerts, aside from Mr. Markov, where the things that struck a sour note, namely the performances of Simone Dinnerstein and Valentina Lisitsa.

    Simone Dinnerstein is a young soloist who played very well.  Unfortunately I was sitting on the right, where I could see her face as she performed, and this was so painful that I had to close my eyes because I could not bear to look at her expression.  The pieces were not sad, but Ms. Dinnerstein’s strong and lovely features were transformed into an expression that was almost a caricature of tragedy and pain.  Her deep set eyes are framed by strong eyebrows that slope at a sharp angle from the center of her face.  As she played, she drew them in toward the center of her face making a deep triangular shadow at her eyes, almost like a deeply shaded diamond formed by a greater-than and less-than sign.  Below she pursed her lips in concentration.  It was as if a clown face had been painted.  A clown face of pain:
    < >
    o
    It is most sad because I am certain this something she cannot control, but it has the potential to control her career.

    The other disappointment, for me at least, was Valentina Lisitsa, with whom I was so impressed in the first performance.  Oh, she handled the Réminiscences quite well.  At that performance I was sitting on the left and was able to watch her amazing technique and that shaded my perception of the concert, because what we hear is also shaped by what we see.  Lisitsa played very fast with very well-oiled elbows and wrists.  It was almost as if her arms were plastic, as if Gumby were playing piano in overdrive.  It was an amazing display.  But when she performed on Saturday, I could not help but notice that yes she is a virtuoso, and yes she draws tremendous audience applause, but she plays like a 3 year old turned loose in a toy shop.  With bravura and energy and gusto and absolutely no subtlety.  When I got home that night, tired though I was, I googled her, but all I found were exclamatory promotional writings, but no reviews.  Perhaps I am wrong.  But I was disappointed.

    The last concert of the weekend was titled Grand Opera Before Wagner and I had not been sure what I would be thrilled mostly because I just am not that familiar with opera.  I have enjoyed what I have seen and heard, but G is not an opera fan and I think his willingness to listen to opera was worn out by his first wife, who apparently was a big opera fan.  At any rate I enjoyed the opera very much.  The excellent young bass, Christopher Van Horn performed again – we had heard him before in the weekend and I had been thrilled by his songs.  In fact all the male vocals were good.  And there were also several roles sung by Nicole Cabell, who although I am no judge of vocal ability, I think must be a fabulously promising young soprano.  In fact if I were in Chicago and they were performing, I would go to the Lyric Opera just to hear Cabell and Van Horn.  The other soprano, who unfortunately sang far more than Nicole Cabell, was shrill and unpleasing to listen to, but the Bellini operas as well as the Rossini, were lovely.  I admit to being partial to Rossini; his oboe concerti were one of my first musical loves, and Rossini’s works will always hold a fond place in my heart.

    I suppose from all I have said it sounds like a less than fabulous weekend, but this is not true.  Bard Music is quite addictive.  One doesn’t want to miss anything.  You never know when some fabulous piece will turn up or some spectacular young performer about whom you know nothing.  Immersing oneself in a musical milieu draws one in and out of normal life.  It is exhausting and exhilarating all at once.  I had a marvelous time.

  • Random Monday

    No I have not dropped off the face of the earth.

    But last week was a constant treadmill run of tasks and problems and general distractions from yarn and needles.  Still a few things were accomplished, mostly in bits and pieces on the weekend:

    1.  Pink socks are done:

    Pinksock7

    2.  The second sleeve has been completed for Otto, which means that I have now completed most of the knitting.  This sleeve needs to be blocked, the sweater must be assembled and the button band must be knitted.  I also have to find the right buttons.  I shall look at the in-house button supply first hoping to find something there before having to search elsewhere.

    3.  While searching through the current project box, I was appalled to find that Rogue is still there, knitted and blocked but not assembled.  I had forgotten that by the time I finished Rogue it was too late for wear last winter and I suppose I didn’t feel like putting it together in the summer.  That has to be finished because we will soon be in fall sweater weather.

    So it looks like I have a lot of sewing and assembly ahead of me.  Not a problem really, except for the time issue.  I am not one of those people who can sew up a sweater while I am at knitting group, talking away.  Professional sewing up requires my full attention.   Which also means that

    4.  I need to start another project.  I have Mermaid which I intend to start but I need to check the calculations and I am not sure that it will be a traveling project, one that I can take to knitting group, or up to Bard to pass the time between concerts.  A second project might need to be found as well.

  • Life is too Short…..

    Ann over at Gorgeous Things  wrote a lovely post the other day titled "Life is too short to buy cheap fabric".   I agree whole heartedly, and since I was unable to post a comment directly to Ann my thoughts are spilling over here after romping around my thoughts throughout the day.

    I agree with Ann that this is not a question of snobbishness.  But it can be a way of life, hence "Life is too short…" for so many things.   Life needs to be embraced, to be lived and buying and struggling to sew cheap fabric is not enjoyable and is not worth the time spent.    As Ann pointed out, "just because a fabric is expensive doesn’t mean it’s not cheap, and
    just because a fabric is cheap, doesn’t mean it’s inexpensive."

    If you love to sew, it is a waste of money and time to spend time on something that is crap.  And cheap fabric, whatever the price is crap, it is money and time down the drain.  You might as well just buy your clothes at Wal-Mart.  But we all know that we don’t sew or knit because we can get shirts and socks at Wal-Mart.   If something is worth spending time on, it is worth doing well with quality materials.  Quality materials do not have to be expensive.  The Internet has made a wider range of fabrics available to more people.  But learning to know and appreciate quality takes time.  I am not saying that we should run around in silk pants and tissue-fine cashmere tees while burping the baby and weeding the garden.  But it is worthwhile to learn about quality and buy the best quality of whatever is appropriate for your needs.  If you need washable pants and cotton tees or blouses, buy good quality cotton, that feels good when you wear it, sews nicely, and holds up well through repeated launderings.  You will feel better and be happier with a few nice things that fit well, and look good, and stand up to the wear and tear of daily life far more than a dozen things that look like crap after a few washings.

    If you need a suit that you are going to wear several days a week all season for a year or more, and it needs to look good traveling, you might not want to invest in super 120’s cashmere blends, which really don’t hold up all that well, and they aren’t meant to.  But you can learn to distinguish the different qualities of wool and buy a good lightweight wool that will sew beautifully and hold up to all the abuse you throw at it.

    My friend Mary used to tease me that whenever we traveled together I always took the same navy suit, and it was true, I did.  I made that suit out of a lightweight pinstripe that sewed beautifully, never wrinkled, and wore like iron.  I spent about $20 dollars a yard for that fabric, and I didn’t think it was that expensive, and I wore that suit for 4 or 5 years, traveled around Europe and the US with it, and was sad it when it finally started to look a little worn.  That suit was well worth the time I put into it, and it would have been a good value even had I spent more on the fabric.

    Life is also to short for cheap linings, cheap interfacings, cheap notions and threads.  They all make the process more difficult and reduce the value of the finished garment.  Life is too short not not to take time pressing and making something to the best of your ability.

    OK, let me get back to that one.

    I wrote a few months back about zippers.  More exactly I wrote about the dearth of good zippers available for purchase near me and how I had decided to buy good zippers by mail (or on my trips to NYC).  Well I kind of did that.  I ordered some basics.  When I set aside a group of fabrics to sew, I would look at the zippers I might need and order them; but I don’t really have an adequate set. 

    For example when I decided to make the maroon skirt I did not have an appropriate zipper.  I thought I did.  I looked in the zipper box and said "I have a maroon zipper" and thought no more about it.  But it was a 24" zipper.  Luckily zippers can be shortened.   I decided that I needed to approach my zipper stash, and yes i now have a zipper stash because life is too short to use a cheap zipper that will break, or to interrupt a sewing project because I have to wait a couple of days for a zipper.

    I have my fabric stash organized by color.  I am pretty consistent in the colors I love to wear and those I don’t.  I also know what lengths of zippers I most commonly use.  So I sat down with a zipper color card and ordered an assortment of zippers in the colors I most frequently sew in the sizes I use most often.  Then I made a list, a spreadsheet actually, where I list the sizes and colors of zippers in stock, and cross them off as I use them.  When I use up a particular size and color of zipper it goes on my sewing notions list, which is one of the ongoing shopping lists that live on my Palm and always travel with me.  You never know when you might find yourself near a zipper source after all, now do you?

    This plan doesn’t work for the exceptions, those fabrics and projects that aren’t in my normal repertoire, but with those projects, I usually know they might be unusual, can check my supply, and order the proper parts at the beginning of the process.  But this way, if I get a mad urge to make a top or a skirt, or most things for that matter, I can just jump right in and sew.  Life is too short to do it any other way.

    The problem is that I increasingly think life is too short for a lot of things:  cheap sentiment, cheap food, cheap wine and so forth.   If life is worth living it is worth living well and fully, seizing every moment and making the most of it.  And so life is also too short to let it be ruled completely by the demands of others.  Life is too short not to put myself first at least some of the time.

    Last week I ran around like crazy responding to everyone else’s crises, saving the day, fixing this and that, and ignoring my own needs and desires.  I was totally spent by the effort and I did not get any time to sew and precious little to knit.  But I don’t have to let weeks like this become the norm.  I can say "no".

    So I am hereby declaring that life is too short not to spend time sewing and knitting.  I insist that I should have some time in my sewing room this week, time to work on my Marfy muslin, and perhaps time for some other things as well.  I want time in my sewing room for my own pleasure and sanity.  In fact, I deserve time in my sewing room because it is, after all, my life, and this is the choice I wish to make.

    Wish me luck.  I tend to waver when faced with the competing demands of others.  But life is too short not to try.

  • It begins

    Opening night at the 2006 Bard Music Festival.  An evening of Liszt.  Fabulous piano, song, and choral works.  Exhaustion.  The first of many three hour concerts.

    Bed.

    More to follow.

  • baby steps

    How do people manage to get so much done?  Is there some essential flaw in my character?  Do I not work enough?  Do I not devote enough time?  Obviously this is true because if I spent more time knitting I would undoubtedly get more done.  But where is the time found?

    I had thought that I would finish Otto by mid July.  Here I am in the second week of August and still plugging away.  I am not actually bored with the project.  I have every intention of spending more time with Otto every day but somehow I never get there, never get settled down with needles in hand.  The final sleeve progresses in tiny baby steps.
    Otto9

    Of course there are other temptations as well, stolen moments curled up with a book, the temptation of other fiberly pursuits. Yes it is true.  I have been spending time sewing as well, and cooking and working in the garden a bit. 

    How does one decide which passion is the one to be indulged in any given moment of spare time?

    Perhaps it would be easier to have but a single hobby.  Life, work, a single passion.  This could be managed.  It will never happen.

  • The Narnian

    The_narnian_1Why do we choose a biography to read?  What do we expect to find?  Do we expect that by finding out something about a person’s life, we will learn something that will explain their work, or is reading a biography simply a voyeuristic exercise?  It is, of course, human to want to know about other people’s lives.   We look to a person’s life to see if it will explain how or why they became famous or successful; we want to know how they are different from us, and yet at the same time we look for similarities to see how they might be like us.  This is especially true if the biography is of someone we think we admire, or whose work or accomplishments we admire.  Do we feel more justified in our admiration if we can also find that the person is like us in someway?, Does the knowledge that they are not like we imagined change our judgement of their work?   Do we think that by understanding an artist we can understand his or her work?

    I often have mixed feelings about biographies of writers, be they writers of fiction or people who write about ideas such as philosophers.  Because writing seems so personal, there is a tendency to think that we are familiar with the person who did the writing because of what we read and admire in their work.  But this may not be the case.  If you love a person’s writing, does that mean you must love them in some way?  Or does learning that a beloved writer is all too human, that he or she has great failings or flaws inextricably alter the perception of the works themselves, as if learning of the flaws of their creator renders the beauty of the work invalid.

    Still, I was eager to read The Narnian, even though I was not sure what I would find there. Except for that part of his life popularized by Shadowlands, I was not at all familiar with Lewis’s life.  But I had read a great many of his books and admired his work.  Perhaps I was intrigued by the man who could write such magnificent scholarly works such as The Allegory of Love and also the science fiction/fantasy world of Out of the Silent Planet and the Narnia books.  I can’t say that the fiction is of the same merit, in a purely literary sense, as Lewis’s scholarly works, but the novels do show a deep love fo fantasy and imagination, and a deep love of STORY in and of itself. 

    I did not read the Narnia books until later, after the age of childhood, after I had read some of his works about Christianity.  My father gave me Mere Christianity and The Screwtape Letters to read when I was 12.  I did not discover Narnia until several years later.  I was, in fact, despite being beyond my years in my selection of reading matter at times, not quite ready for those books although they made deep impressions on me.  Screwtape frightened me terribly for a long time.  It took some time before I could appreciate the satire and irony in that book, but I suspect that a true understanding of satire is not yet fully developed at age 12, except perhaps in the most precocious.  But I remembered both books and read them again later, when they actually made a deeper impression on me.

    I did not expect the book to change my perception of Lewis as a writer because whatever the life of the person, it is the life of the mind that is reflected in written works and anyone with an imagination knows that the mind can offer a totally different life than reality.  In our minds we can be the best that we can be, we can be unfettered from the constraints of our lives.  The value of a writer’s works has very little to do with the life of the writer itself, except in how the shaping of the writer occurred. 

    Perhaps that is what I am seeking when reading a biography of a writer, some kind of knowledge of how they became a writer.  Perhaps I want to know what shaped them and gave them the gift of placing words and thoughts on a page.

    The Narnian did not disappoint.  I enjoyed the book, and yes, I was thrilled to find things that Lewis and I had in common, especially the fact that we both loved Spenser’s Faeroe Queen and the stories of George MacDonald as young people.  It was a thrill to hear about how Lewis loved the imaginary world and the life of the imagination, and how he despaired of a generation of young people growing up without that sense of the endless possibility to be found in fantasy worlds, but even that should not have surprised me.  Allegory and fantasy are not unrelated and they both seem quite outdated in modern life and our belief in science and the practicality of the “real”.   It did not surprise me that he described himself as a dinosaur.  I have felt at times to be out of touch with the modern world myself, but I am no CS Lewis.

    And so I felt thrilled that I could share some interests with Lewis, even though much of his life seems incomprehensible to me.  I should not have been surprised to find some common thread, because I have admired and read such a broad assortment of his works, and his writings have made a deep impression on me.  As should be the case after reading an inspiring biography of a writer, I wish to reread many of the works and perhaps over the next few months I shall pick up a few volumes and re-acquaint myself with Lewis’s writings.

  • What size pattern?

    I was tired and draggy and a little bit on the short-tempered side this weekend and you would think that would be a perfect time to hide out in the sewing room.  But I didn’t.  I worked pretty extensively in the garden eliminating masses of overgrowth which had overtaken everything in the last month, and I went to the farmer’s market, planned the menus, did the shopping and went to the gym.  I increased the intensity of my gym workouts last week, which probably accounts for the dragginess.

    I realized this morning that I could have been playing with my new sewing machine feet, which I picked up on Friday:

    Feet

    This would have been the perfect thing to do when I was too tired and grumpy to actually cut something out or trace and alter a pattern.  Just playing with seams might have perked me up enough to actually make something.   But they are still here, waiting for the perfect moment, waiting for play time.

    The plan had been to whip up a couple of tees this weekend.  I have the Jalie tee pattern I have long wanted to try, but I realized late last night that I really need to test a pattern or two in from the Marfy catalog so I can figure out which sizes to order.  The patterns I bought last year, based on my full bust measurement, and guessing the translation from Big 4 patterns, were too big through the upper bodice even then, more so now.

    Based on the best calculations I can manage from the size ranges they give and a few judicious measurements on the pattern sheet, I think I need to cut either a 44 or a 46 in order to get the best fit through the upper chest and upper back.  Of course I will have to alter from there.  It is kind of strange to think that I really have no idea, or only a vague idea of where to begin.  Perhaps I should have started with a 46, but instead I started tracing the 44 off this morning early, before breakfast, and I will finish it this afternoon.  Then I will compare it to my basic bodice block, which is granted a little too large at this point, but I think I can figure out how to make the transition to my new size.

    I am not going to make a wearable muslin at this point, just basic muslins, to figure out which size works best for me.  This whole thing may be silly as I have lost 15 pounds but will more than likely lose a good bit more.  Of course I will have to add to the 44 at bust, waist and hips, I am just trying to fit the upper chest, and for this pattern at least, 44 is the smallest size.

  • A day in the garden

    It is a pleasure to be outside today working in the yard.  It is still hot; it is summer after all and heat is to be expected; but the oppressive humidity seems to have abated a bit and one no longer walks out the door to be blasted by the force of the wet soggy heat, as if one has walked into a tiny space surrounding an over-vigorous hot-tub, steam pouring out, blasting body to a state of exhaustion so dense and wet that all one can do is sit and loll about.

    A hot summer day can be a glorious thing.  Oh yes, I might prefer to dig on a cooler day, but cooler days have been few and far between this summer and I see none on the horizon.  This day, hot but dry with a bit of a breeze, seems like the epitome of summer and there is much summer work to be done.  Nature’s overabundant growth must be beaten back and tamed, forced to my bidding.  There are gardens-in-waiting to be cleared, rose bushes to be moved before the construction crews resume their labors, new beds to be built. 

    Oh it shall not all be done today.  Probably only a small start shall be accomplished, but I must seize what opportunity arises.  I had planned to go to the gym and sew today, but if I go to the gym early I will not work in the yard later, I will laze about; and if I work in the yard now I will undoubtedly be to tired to push the weights later today, but gardening is its own form of work and I shall be happy to employ those muscles as well.  The beds that have needed water have been hosed down, The vegetable garden will be weeded next.  Then I shall have to tackle clearing a new space for the huge climbing rose that still abides at the corner of the once-pool-deck, before that area is flattened and rebuilt.  I am glad I let it stay, I have enjoyed seeing its abundant roses out the living room window all summer, but now that construction is about to resume, I can no longer delay and must resign myself to fighting the large thorny thing.  It is my own fate, my own decision that brought me here.

    And now, this brief break for water and a cool-down has been spent and it is outdoors to the blue skies and the glorious sunshine (even though I am hidden under long sleeves and a big hat) bending mother nature to my will.

  • Some thoughts on THE WASTE LANDS

    I am not very far into The Waste Lands yet and it is already starting to be a very interesting book.  Although I don’t usually ponder and make notes on popular novels as I read them, this one has me changing my ways.  Oh it is still a great story, and so far each volume has been a great story in itself, with a complete ending so that one does not fee the rush to move on to the next novel.  But each subsequent volume (subsequent layer) adds and builds on the ones that have gone before it.

    The symbolism and sense of dichotomy that is building in this, Volume 3, is particularly interesting.  This is the third Volume of a series (3).  In the second Volume, called The Drawing of the Three, there were three doors and at the end there were three companions embarking on a quest.  And here things get more complicated.  One of the companions was a person divided, one who had become two, and who in the end is reunited and made whole, two who are made one by the uniting factor of a third.  So the one who becomes two becomes three in a sense.  At the third door Roland realizes that the person who acts as his bridge is not the person he will bring back to his own world, but that rather, he will become the third, or he will become Death as he thinks at that time.  But at the same time the third door leads to something that unites all the companions.  And Roland’s actions when he enters the third changes the past, both his and someone else’s.

    In book 1 Roland met the boy Jake, and at the end of book 1 Jake died. Jake’s death will always affect Roland’s fate.  In Book 2, Jake resurfaces behind the third door, but here he is only a secondary character, something that happens, the righting of a wrong perhaps, but it does not seem primary to the plot.  In book 2 Roland saves Jake from the fate that he had faced in book 1.

    But Roland remembered Jake from when he was in Roland’s world.  And Roland remembers the death of Jake.  When Roland prevents Jake from dying in his own world and entering Roland’s world he changes both of their fates.  Now he is divided in two.  There is the Roland post door #3, who knows there was no Jake, and yet he remembers the other history as well, the Roland who knew Jake and it was Jake and his fate that sent Roland on the path that lead him to the doors to begin with.  Roland knows two pasts, knows they cannot both be correct, but knows they are.

    At the same time, in another world there is a little boy named Jake, a little boy who is not run over by a car, a little boy who does not die.  All this is true.  But this boy Jake also knows that he was run over by the car, that he died and went to Roland’s world and that Roland let him die again.  He knows both stories cannot be true and yet he knows they are. 

    Although I haven’t gotten there yet, it seems that Roland has set in course a path that must result in his being reunited with Jake.  And so at the third door, Roland did not draw a third companion and yet he did, as he made it possible for Jake to live and by doing so changed both of their fates.

    This is proving to be a very sophisticated novel, and a great read as well.