Author: 459856pwpadmin

  • McCarthy and McEwan

    Simultaneously reading Saturday  by Ian McEwan and No Country for Old Men  by Cormac Mccarthy is proving to be an apt comparison.  I did not intend to read them at the same time but when the Mccarthy arrived today I couldn’t help but dip in.  Soon I was hooked.  Mccarthy’s prose is almost the opposite of McEwans, spare, harsh almost as opposed to McEwans gorgeous lines.  But both writers write beautifully and evocatively, drawing you into their worlds.

    These worlds are quite opposite, but yet…..

    The novels are not as different as they might seem. 

    More to come.

  • Yes I can sew a simple project

    Well, it is reassuring to know that I actually can whip out a quick simple sewing project when I want.  I will continue to work on a little sewing every day, although none got done yesterday, I was just too tired after the total mental exhaustion that follows Bard Music.  I love this festival, but I am sure I need a vacation after it. 

    The red cotton skirt turned out really well and I wore it Saturday.  Here I am toward the end of the day, about 6 PM when this photo was taken, and I have just run home for a brief swim and to change for dinner and the evening concerts:

    Redskirt7There are a couple of important things to note here, at least to my way of thinking.  The skirt is not particularly crumpled or baggy despite the fact that it is cotton and I did not underline it  — that is just dumb luck as I did not expect this much from the fabric.  I suppose I have a natural predilection to discount the quality of anything I get from JoAnn.

    I am sure the lack of crumpling or lines around the crotch is also due to the idea that I am finally getting somewhere with my attempts to get a straight or pencil skirt to fit me well and be wearable when I sit, without creeping up to hooker-like height on my thighs.  I seem to have finally managed a near perfect pencil skirt that looks good and is comfortable.

    This skirt is pretty snug through the waist and upper hip, where not much ease or movement is needed, at least for me, and tapers down at the knees.  In between, around the hip joint and upper thighs it is much roomier without looking too baggy.   Since I have been constantly refining the same pattern, Vogue 7333, an OOP Sandra Betzina Pattern, I think I am finally getting it right.

    Vogue7333In the end I believe it doesn’t really matter which skirt pattern is used, as long as one gets one just right, so that it always works with a little tweaking.  If you have read my past posts on skirts you know that I have recently been frustrated with wearing a-line and long floaty skirts and wanted a straight skirt that really fit without wearing out at the stress points along the upper thigh and that didn’t creep up to my crotch when I sat. 

    Since I have scoliosis and my back was fused, I don’t have the normal lower lordotic curve that most people have which allows for a more gentle curving of the body when sitting.  I sit like a board,  or a right-angle square, more like a capital "L".  My constant bug-a-boo has been getting a skirt to fit so it looks good and still has room.  This skirt is a fairly stiff fabric and it looks good.  Imagine the possibilities.

    Otherwise, since this was really a quick project there are no particularly interesting technique details to report.  I never have cut the seam allowances off this pattern and I did not mark the stitching lines on the fabric as I usually do (quick remember).  I used dressmaker’s carbon to mark any relevant marks, including the darts, which may have been a mistake.

    I usually construct my skirt first, sewing in the zipper and all the seams before sewing the actual darts.  This allows me to pull the skirt on and pin fit the darts so that they fit me in the actual fabric being used.  Although I have the darts marked on the pattern, there tend to be minor differences in each version of the skirt depending on the body and hand of each fabric.  Usually I mark the beginning of the darts with tailor’s tacks, just to have a reference point, and work from there.

    As I said, I am getting better at this skirt so most of the darts were spot-on, except for the right front quadrant, where the final location had little to do with the tentative placement of the marking lines on the wrong side of the fabric:
    Redskirt2As you can see, one is pretty close and the other is not.  This difference may have played a big roll in why this skirt fit so much better, and bagged less than past versions of the skirt.

    I also did the curved dart in the back differently.  That dart remains a learning process, and I always have to thank Heather Claus at See It Sew It  for teaching me to pin the darts to fit and giving me the confidence to realize that, if I needed a curved dart (kind of like a big C) then I should just go for it.

    Otherwise no other special techniques.  Serged seam edges.  I did interface the zipper and put stay tape around the waist seam, but I did not interface the hem, although I usually would.  The fabric came seamed together at the side selvages as it was really two pieces of fabric cut out and quilted together.  I planned to use the joined seam edge as my hem but in the end did not like it.

    The original stitching was crooked and bright orange:

    Redskirt6
    When I looked at the skirt in the mirror you really couldn’t tell from more than 3 feet away that it was not OK, but still it bugged me and I knew if I looked down at my lap whenever I was wearing this skirt it would annoy me no end.  Luckily the handy micro-surgical scalpel is a very efficient seam ripper:

    Redskirt5

    and the old stitching was rapidly removed to be replaced with something that matched a little better:

    Redskirt4_1

    A simple petersham waistband, stitched at the waistline, turned under, and anchored by stitching-in-the-ditch at the side seams and darts completed the skirt.

    Redskirt8

  • Getting My Sewing Together

    Why can I get bits of knitting done most days, but not get to any sewing?  I should be able to manage at least 15 minutes and probably more.  I must have some kind of mental block where, if I only have a few minutes, I will knit a row, but not go start up a sewing machine.  I really need to work on this because I really do want to finish more sewing and feel grumpy when I don’t get to it.

    This is a piece of fabric I got at JoAnn’s.  It was probably expensive for JoAnn, at least my local store, although I really don’t remember the price, still less than $10 a yard,  but I am not going to do the work sewing these two fabrics together.  My goal is to whip up a simple straight skirt before the weekend.  It doesn’t sound like much does it?

    Redskirt1Bard Music is gearing up:  I haven’t a hope of sewing this weekend, although this, the first Bard Music weekend is light this year in terms of what I at least have to do:

    Here’s the general plan, from roughly 6 PM Friday until  roughly 9 on Sunday:
    5 concerts
    2 parties (I am not cooking)
    2 gourmet picnics in which I do provide the food for 6.

    Friday will be cooking day as I will be out of the house by 9 both Saturday and Sunday.

    As you see, not much sewing time there.  Can I squeeze in a simple skirt today and tomorrow.  I need to get myself sewing more regularly.  I am up for the challenge.

  • “A Child of Our Time” at Berkshire Choral

    BerkshireAnother week at Berkshire Choral Festival. The last concert remains my favorite, but last night’s concert was also very nice.  The concert opened with one of Henry Purcell’s odes written for the birthday of Queen Mary, the one I know best, although it may or may not be the most commonly performed, “Come, Ye Sons of Art, Away”, which was cheerful, beautiful and generally well performed.

    It was really an excellent opening piece.

    The main work of the evening was Tippett’s “A Child of Our Time”.  An interesting aspect of the performance was that yesterday was the 60th Anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima and the concert was sung, at least partly, in tribute to those who died that day.

    We were informed in the program notes and the lecture that Tippet wrote this piece of his own volition, there was no commission, no call for a choral  work.  He wrote the work out of his own desire to write a work with a political theme and his desire to deal with and address the events going on the world which were also causing him great inner turmoil.

    This is to some extent visible in the music as it is deeply personal, at times it seems like a pastiche, blending specific vignettes of the events which prompted the work with more personal and diverse accounts of human suffering and touches of philosophy or Jungian analysis attempting to universalize and humanize the events and the feelings involved.  It is an ambitious goal and Tippet is not always successful.  Tippet is a masterful composer and one can get caught up in the emotional tenor of the music, which successfully balances spare modernity with warm traditional music and themes.  At the same time, if one listens to the text and follows along, there passages and themes that make no sense, that become almost unintelligible, not that any individual section is nonsense, just that the plan of the work seems to follow the fragmentary lines of mental turmoil rather than a progressively reasoned course.

    The narrative is vivid and very focused, no names or given or specific references to actual events, although the reference and the actions are clear.  Far more time is devoted to the “why” that drives the action than the terrible acts themselves.  The murder is underplayed.  The Nazi Pogrom is a very short, strict and filled with menace.  It is filled with the group frenzy of mass hysteria and strong Biblical overtones recalling religious hysteria.  The combination is quite unsettling.

    After the shocking clash of human suffering, emotion, and horror in the first two movements, the third comes as something of a shock.  Here philosophy seems to play a stronger role and the answers are somewhat surprising.  Despite the strong references to the Judaeo-Christian tradition and the use of spirituals, this is most definitely not a religious work although it is strongly pacifist.  The boy, the “child of our time” is not uplifted.  “What of the boy, then?” He presumed to judge as if he were God, he presumed to take a life “his manhood broken in the clash of powers.  God overpowered him”.

    Tippet’s answer is that the solution and salvation, if one can call it that, lies within ourselves. “I would know my shadow and my light, so shall I at last be whole”.    This is a humanist solution, a pacifist solution, but not necessarily a religious one.  There is no hand of God holding up the cause of the righteous here, but the quiet spring of self-realization.  Remember, in 1940 this was not the popular path. If one wishes to be roused up and justified, this is not the work one should seek out. 

    I was particularly interested in the roles the 5 spirituals played in the work.  I am not usually a fan of gussied up spirituals but I believe that Tippet does a masterful job with them here.  They are definitely enhanced and rearranged, but they do not lose their essential character, perhaps their power is enhanced because the ornateness of the music surrounding the spirituals contrasts strongly with the spare necessity of much of the music in the other sections of the oratorio.  The rich music and the warmth of the Spirituals themselves provide a very warm, human contrast and response to the darker aspects of human nature and this work.

    The spirituals are very well timed.  Each one serves to bring the listener in to the music, to become a participant as one recognizes the sound and wants to sing along, even only mentally.  They break up the work, drawing the listener in, embracing the emotions evoked by each spiritual and tying together the various threads of the oratorio.  This work to me seems to be one of the more successful juxtapositions of popular and sophisticated taste.

  • Cool Linen for Hot Summers

    Cool and almost crisp in new linen pants.

    Yellowlinen5_1

  • Finally! New Linen Pants

    Yellowlinen4Don’t you think it is about time they are done?  I certainly do. 

    It seems like I have spent FOREVER on these pants, although they have actually just been sitting in my sewing room all that time, waiting for me to squeeze in bits of time here and there.

    I planned to finish them Friday, and  in fact had just attached the waistband (partially) when we decided to take a spur of the minute trip into NYC.  I knitted on the train, had a fabulous lunch at The Alamo which is a terrible name for  a Mexican restaurant but the food is really excellent.  We each had a different kind of ceviche to start, then George had the fabulous Chicken with Huitlacoche sauce and I had Grilled Scallops — ooooh so good!

    We went to the National Design Museum (Cooper Hewitt forever in my mind) and saw the Extreme Textiles  exhibit which was wonderful because it appealed to both my fiber loving and my techie nerdy tendencies.  They also have swatches posted that you get to touch and feel.  How cool is that!  I love the whole idea of using modern materials and traditional techniques to make something really strong and useful and wonderful.  Amazing stuff!

    I finished the machine sewing Sunday morning because Saturday somehow got out of hand.  The hem took another couple of hours so the pants weren’t actually done until last night.  Not much interesting to see here:  they’re only pants after all, relatively boring sewing.

    Yellowlinen2

    In the end I left off the drawstring and did a modified elastic waist.  There is still a back zipper and darts, but elastic as well, kind of a hybrid pair of pants. 

    The hand hem kind of takes them out of the really fast and simple category I guess, but I really like the way they turned out and I am happy. 

    Yellowlinen3

  • Sewing Kitty

    "Ohhh! This sewing just wears me out."

    Tabasco2_2

    The yellow pants are (mostly) done.  I just have to hem them.  The hem is all pinned up and waiting.  We are going to see March of the Penguins  tonight though, so they might not be finished until tomorrow.

  • Law or Philosophy?

    As the process of affirming the nomination of a new Supreme Court Justice gears up, the September Atlantic had a couple of interesting commentaries on the performance and role of the court.  If I had doubts or worries about the Court before reading these articles, they have not been assuaged. 

    It seems difficult to believe that the current approval process and political climate would allow for anyone of intelligence coupled with strong convictions to ever make it to the court, unless they followed such a conservative, low key, non-political course that there is nothing anyone can object to in their public record.  But then, is anyone who has followed such a course really the kind of person we want on the Supreme Court?  This is my question.

    But then, according to Stuart Taylor, Jr. in a commentary in the September 2005 Atlantic Monthly,  The Supreme Court seems hardly relevant as it is.    His description of the court as out of touch and operating from an ivory tower seems very close to the truth, and very far from the court we need.  This is not to say the justices aren’t extremely smart and extremely dedicated and well-meaning.  But how can a court determine the fitness of the laws of the country if it has no practical experience in how the law in this country actually works?  Is the court truly an abstract authority? Or does it need to be a working court that is the highest cog in the machine, the oil that keeps the entire system running smoothly and well.  Someone has to decide all the quotidian issues that make the courts and therefore society work and work well.

    Is the court a court or a legislative body?   Is it a platform from which hard-working brown-nosers finally get their day to spout sophomoric philosophies masquerading under the guise of law. 

    In another commentary on the same subject, Without Precedent  Benjamin Wittes:      
        "The justices don’t have to observe precedent so they fudge doctrine.  They don’t have to  describe facts accurately, so they take liberties.  They don’t have to restrain themselves, so they don’t.  And they don’t have to write opinions rigorously enough to give precise guidance to the lower courts, which do not have the luxury of winging it".

    Perhaps the issue shouldn’t be term limits on legislators but term limits on Justices.

  • But don’t we all do this?

    "I think perhaps it is a mistake of the ruling to think that you can change the ruled."

                   Daniel Mason,The Piano Tuner pp223