Author: 459856pwpadmin

  • Interfacing Part 2

    A couple of days ago I discussed the fusible interfacings I
    have been using along with some ideas as to how things might be changing in the
    future. The second drawer of my
    file-cabinet contains the sew-in interfacings, my subject for today’s post.

    I know that I have probably more interfacing than a lot of
    people. This really doesn’t bother me,
    but the amount of fusibles will be reduced as I work through the various
    samples purchased. Still, I really don’t
    mind using sew-in interfacing and there is quite a bit in the second file
    drawer, more than I had initially realized.

    Silk Organza: I usually keep a variety on hand, especially
    in peach, which seems to work well under most things, and off-white or
    white. I usually get these from Thai
    Silks. I also keep silk organza in other
    colors, when I find those I like or think I might use. Sometimes a color is necessary if I think
    there may be show through and besides silk organza can make lovely blouses and
    nice accents on other garments. Right now I have deep green and a couple of
    shades of purple, besides the basics.

    Cotton Batiste: Also makes a nice soft underlining for
    certain garments and can add a little gentle support where fusibles will not
    work. I can’t find 100% cotton batiste around
    me so I buy it when I see it; I might have a couple of different weights on
    hand. Since this fabric also makes
    lovely lightweight summer tops and blouses, I keep colors in stock as well,
    especially when I can find the deeper colors I prefer to wear.

    Hair Canvas or Hymo: Stocked in various weights and almost always
    used in jackets and tailored garments, at least a little piece somewhere. I can’t seem to wean myself away from hair
    canvas and move to completely fused garment. Hair canvas has changed a great deal over the years. The stuff of old was stiff and often contained
    horse hair. G remembers stiff jackets
    from his childhood with horsehair interfacings that would occasionally poke him
    through the wool of the jacket.  Today,
    the ones called Hair Canvas today are stiffer and often a large part polyester
    instead of horse hair. I tend to use the
    Hymo or Hymo Hair Canvas products. Now
    most of them are at least partly rayon. I try to find blends with a high degree of goat hair or wool mixed with the
    rayon and I have several types from several sources, some is fairly stiff, some
    fairly soft. I adore the premium hymo
    from Greenberg and Hammer called EURO, which is 42% wool,  because it is firm yet soft with good drape
    but I also tend to keep a few pieces of their other products, such as LT-030 which is 30% cotton, 34% hair and
    is quite firm for those times I need serious support in a garment. I also use MD-021 and the hymo called BLACK,
    which is black. The hymo I recently
    purchased from THE SEWING PLACE   is a middle weight, between the Euro and the
    LT-030. I haven’t used it yet, but I
    think it may prove useful. 

    Years ago I also used a good bit of Cotton
    Organdy
    . It was great for
    plackets and collars in lightweight cotton and handkerchief linen blouses as
    well as other lightweight garments. I would also use it to interface button or
    buttonhole bands in crisp tops.  I would
    get it at a store in the garment district that sold only imported Swiss
    cottons, long since closed. It was
    available in several colors. Now I can
    only find white and usually have to purchase it from an heirloom sewing
    store. I like organdy because it is
    firmer than organza or batiste yet still light and semi-sheer. As I fashions
    have gotten softer, I tend to use organza more than organdy, but I still keep a
    small bit around.

    Baby Flannel: I started using this many years ago, when I
    first read Sandra Betzina’s POWER SEWING, the original version. She used it to underline jackets, especially
    jackets made from lightweight silk fabrics. Remember those silk crepe-de-chine and sueded silk jackets of the late
    1980’s and early 1990’s? I loved
    those. I used the flannel to underline
    some of them but eventually, as I noticed that in designer jackets the entire
    body of the silk might be fused, I moved on to using fusing my silks to
    permanently underline them and “beef up” the fabric. Sometimes the baby flannel is the perfect
    thing though and I still use it, it can also be great for underlining a jacket
    or coat where the fabric is not quite heavy enough. 

    Wool Felt, Lambswool, and Mohair: I keep small bits of these for use in
    sleeve heads or occasionally other places. Pure versions of these are increasingly hard to find but the blends
    aren’t nearly as versatile for use in garment construction. Sometimes they are purchased. Some of my mohair consists of scraps from
    garments or sweaters which I have felted. I don’t usually need large pieces so scraps suffice.

    I have a couple of pieces of Coutil
    which I purchased as an understructure for corset or bustier-like bodices when
    I was sewing more evening gowns. It was
    also useful in those wide, waist cinching belts that were popular for a few
    years, as well as the boned, corset based blouses, when I wanted something more
    structured. I considered using it to
    actually try to make a corset last year when I was having increasing problems
    standing up straight due to pain or just plain old crookedness in my back. I might still consider this but at the moment
    regular Pilates seems to be helping and the crooked days are fewer.

    I also have pieces of several products that are sold as
    sew-in interfacings, such as VeriShape which is used to stiffen collar stands,
    flex weave, and a few others. I am not
    particularly consistent in my use of them, but there have been times I have
    been very happy to have them on hand.

    Oddly enough I may be coming full circle. Originally, when I started sewing, I
    exclusively used sew in interfacings and had trouble with fusibles. Then I moved away from sew-in interfacing and
    fused almost everything. Now I use both
    and have found myself appreciating their different qualities.

  • A Good Book

    What fools these mortals be.

                            —  Seneca

    Very interesting novel.  Suspenseful til the end (and I tend to read the end in advance but the suspense remained).

    Almondpicker

  • Interfacing

    As I moved the interfacing supply back into my sewing room I
    started to think about interfacing, what I use, what I don’t, and what might
    need to be changed.

    For a long time I always used the same interfacings. Because I had come to like the performance of
    certain interfacings, and because I could not usually get them locally, I began
    buying bolts or large pieces to insure that I always had some on hand.  To make life simpler I settled on a couple of
    interfacings that I consistently liked and stuck to them.

    The first two interfacings that I used consistently were Armo
    Weft and Fusi Knit. Armo Weft is used
    for support in tailored garments, kind of like a fusible hair canvas I
    guess. I used Fusi Knit for everything
    else. Probably not very sophisticated
    but it worked for me.

    Gradually I noticed that designers made jackets out of
    lightweight fabrics like cottons and silks and fused the entire body pieces to
    give the fabric enough weight to function in the more tailored application of a
    jacket. Fusi Knit was too firm for this
    and I eventually found So-Sheer. For
    years I used So Sheer and eventually, Textured Weft, which came out later. Sometimes people had trouble fusing Textured
    Weft and I haven’t found that it works well with all fabrics. It certainly maintains the loft of textured
    fabrics better than So Sheer and it changes the hand of the fabric far
    less. In time Textured Weft became my
    primary fusible for underlining, but I still use So Sheer for some things.

    As I mentioned above, I can’t get these interfacings
    locally. Most of them are, or were, sold
    on 25 yard bolts so I just bought bolts of each so that I would have them on
    hand. When I get started on a project,
    nothing kills it faster than having to put it aside waiting for interfacing to
    arrive. By the time the interfacing
    would arrive other things would have happened and the sewing project would be
    abandoned. It seemed excessive in the beginning, but I have had to replace every bolt of my original purchases, some more than once.

    These interfacings now live in one of the top drawers of the
    file cabinets that make up my cutting table.

    But my needs or ideas about sewing are in the process of
    change.

    I have two full or almost full bolts of Armo Weft in two
    colors, probably a lifetime supply at this point. I find that Armo Weft is sometimes too firm
    for the kind of very light soft shaping that is fashionable in women’s jackets
    now and I might want to find something different.

    Fusi Knit is still useful, but again is too firm for some
    knits and light fabrics, although so-sheer works well for support in very light
    knits, and I have been increasingly using it for structural support in knit garments. I might need something in between. Both Fusi Knit and So Sheer change the hand
    of some fabrics too much, although on others there seems to be little
    difference. I still adore Textured Weft
    and am almost out, so you know that will be replaced soon.

    BUT

    What do I do about new styles in interfacings and tailoring of
    women’s garments? I don’t really want to
    stock a dozen different interfacings. Life needs to be simple. But I
    also want to accomplish a particular look.

    My discontent started about a year and a half ago, in
    September 2004. I was making a jacket
    out of a very nice menswear suiting fabric from Dormeuil. I did need to fuse parts of the front of the
    jacket, but the fabric had a good bit of body and I was having trouble getting
    the look I wanted. So Sheer was too
    stiff. Textured Weft maintained much
    more of the drape of the fabric but still made it too “thick” and affected the
    drape just enough that I was not satisfied. I did not know how to proceed, so I put the jacket aside.

    I picked that jacket up again a few months later when some
    of the sewists at Sewing World  were involved in a “January Jacket
    Journey”. I ordered a bunch of samples
    of interfacings from several places, intending to make samples and compare them
    and reconsider the entire interfacing question. In the meantime, while I waited for UPS, I looked at the various other
    odd bits of interfacing I had on hand. There was some red interfacing I got from Sandra Betzina called “Armani
    Interfacing”, no longer available, which had good drape, but was not as nice as
    the Textured Weft in this fabric. And I
    had some interfacing called DEEP FLESH COLORED FUSIBLE INTERFACING from Fabric
    Collections which I had used for a silk jacket the previous year, finding it to
    be much softer and with better drape than So Sheer. I had also used this interfacing on a light
    topper made from a hand-woven wool which was something like a cross between
    gauze and burlap with a very loose open weave. I ended up using this interfacing on the blue menswear wool as it had
    drape and suppleness I wanted. The
    fabric was just like a slightly spongier version of itself with more
    support. The hand was much more like the
    original fabric than with the Textured Weft. The jacket turned out to be wonderful. Fabric Collections no longer imports this interfacing however and the
    little bit I have left cannot be replaced.

    When I started moving interfacing into its home in the new
    sewing room, I began to readdress these questions. I still have those samples, about a yard of
    each, waiting in a box. I wondered what to do with all of
    them. I also still had some of that
    wonderful blue menswear suiting left, the one that gave me interfacing
    difficulties.

    The solution seemed to be that I should make an interfacing
    catalog. I decided, for consistency, all
    interfacings should be fused to the same fabric no matter what they were
    intended for. That way I would have a
    basis for comparison. Each sample should
    also be adequately large that I could get some sense of the hand and/or
    potential drape of the fused fabric. I
    decided to cut 8” by 10” pieces of the navy wool and fuse them, with each
    interfacing getting a page in a standard three ring binder. A sample of the same wool, unfused, would be
    saved for control purposes.

    Interfacing3_copy

    Here are some of the pages with the fabric samples, and me
    squinching one piece to see how it feels. I am learning there are some interesting interfacings out there and I
    see several that might be good for light flexible underlinings. I am not sure where I will go with this yet,
    but there are certainly possibilities and there are a couple of potential new
    favorites. I certainly think that one
    of the new ultra-light fusibles will replace so-sheer as my other standard
    underlining in the near future. Luckily
    I have pieces of several nice things. I
    will keep you informed of the changes.

    I am also impressed so far with the sample Whisper Weft that
    I have fused. It seems something like
    Armo Weft but much lighter, with a much softer hand. This may be what I am looking for to achieve
    that softer tailoring look.  I will definitely be trying this in upcoming projects.

    It seems there have been many changes in the world of
    interfacings and I am looking forward to trying some of these new, at least to
    me, products. I also think that my new
    interfacing catalog will prove invaluable when I am looking for something to achieve
    a desired look. Although interfacing
    will react differently with each fabric, having the samples gives me a big leg
    up on the process of narrowing down my choices. I am sure that eventually my catalog will be expanded to have samples on
    other base fabrics as well. In the end,
    I think the time spent compiling this book will prove to be time very well
    spent.

  • the hands remember

    I am amazed how the hands can remember skills I would have
    thought long since lost.

     

    When we were shopping the other day, G saw a bag of frozen
    smelts and we bought them. I was
    certainly game to give them a try. When
    they were defrosted today I set to cleaning and boning them. I thought it would take me a long time, but
    after one, my hands and fingers remembered, almost instinctively, how to cut
    just through the flesh, run my fingers along the side, catching the backbone
    with my thumbnail and pulling out the bones and ribs, flicking out the entrails
    unscathed, gently rubbing off any remaining scales under cold water. The staff at my local fish market don’t do so
    well, little bits of the innards are usually attached, sometimes damaging the
    flavor of the flesh.

     

    How did I learn this? I did not grow up near water. We
    did not eat smelts. But I fondly
    remember my father teaching us how to scale, bone and gut whole fish, usually
    perch or bream. I seam to remember the
    rule was that if you can catch them you can clean them. As I reached down and cut the head behind the
    gills, slit the fish and pulled out the skeleton from the tail end my hands
    seemed to be reliving some old ritual that I had all but forgotten and I was
    young again, sitting on the dirt of the back yard on Washington Street, scaling
    and gutting fish. I could almost hear
    the sound of dad’s knife as he scraped the scales off the skin. I could almost see the small transparent
    scales flying through the air, catching the light, sticking to everything.

     

    I do remember after all.

  • John delivered the new pot rack today and it is gorgeous, far nicer than I expected.  I think we have found a true gem here (the carpenter I mean).

    Potrack

    I love looking up and over at the lines of the chimney, fireplace, vent hood and pot rack from the kitchen sink as seen here.  There are no pots in the rack yet; they shall reside in the dining room until the middle or end of next week.  I never dreamed that it would be so hard to find 6" S-type hooks for pot racks.  Only one store had any idea, my last stop by the way, and they are now on order.

    The color of the new pot rack is very close to the ceiling and it was built to fit perfectly in the rectangle formed by the crossing of the beams in the ceiling next to the fireplace.  John used new wood which looks old and has lots of character, it is some kind of local pine.  He had trouble finding dowels he liked so he hand planed these, making a pot rack that fits perfectly with the rustic, old/new, country/craftsman/modern overtures that form my house.

  • Southern Comforts

    It’s so nice to have the sun coming in through the kitchen window again.  Spring is definitely coming…

    Southerncomforts

    minced jalapeno and garlic look lovely in the light.

    Southerncomforts2

    fresh grilled gulf shirmp on warm black-eyed pea and tomato "salad". 

  • An Island Cutting Table

    Middlecuttingtable_1
    Very little progress has actually been made on the new sewing room, but there is one little island of progress and promise.  You see the only section of wall which has been painted, just barely finished and dry before the file cabinets arrived, and the new cutting table sitting on top of filing cabinets.  Notice the chair in the front left, that is the top of my desk chair, which hits just below my shoulder blades when sitting.  The blue trim will remain, although some deep green-turquoise will be added.   The little corner of white in the upper right is the old wall color, soon to be vanquished.

    The new cutting table is in, less its cutting mat, which is being custom made to fit the top and has not yet arrived.   I love seeing the wood of the table top now, and it will look much more industrial once the mat has arrived, but I see no point in ruining this beautiful cherry and walnut table with a rotary cutter.  I had originally planned on just having a plywood top made, but we had this, our old dining table top, and it was easy enough to remove the legs and use it.

    The table dominates the room, which I expected in an abstrat intellectual sort of way, but the reality of it takes getting used to.  Having a large, 3 1/2 by 6 1/2 foot table in the middle of a 10 1/2 by 13 1/2 foot room makes a definite statement.  The table is also TALL.  I put our old dining table top on top of four file cabinets, each three drawers high, so the finished table is approximately 42 1/2 to 43 inches high, just a couple of inches below my elbow.  This is perfect cutting table height, and it was the impetus for the entire sewing room redo.

    Of course having such a massive centerpoint to the room means that this sewing room will be much more of a workroom than a cozy sitting/sewing room. 

    For now I love seeing the wood and the cabinets and the little bit of wall color which glows nicely when the sun hits it later in the morning.  The green is lighter than I originally wanted, but a deeper green will be too dark and now that I see it on the walls, I am sure I made a happy choice.  This small  island in the middle of the room already makes me smile and inspires me to get on with the rest of the work.

  • Harbison and Milosz

    A Task
    In fear and trembling, I think I would fulfill my life
    Only if I brought myself to make a public confession
    Revealing a sham, my own and of my epoch:
    We were permitted to shriek in the tongue of dwarfs and demons
    But pure and generous words were forbidden
    Under so stiff a penalty that whoever dared to pronounce one
    Considered himself as a lost man.

                        — Czelaw Milosz, 1970
                        taken from text to John Harbison’s Milosz Songs
                        New York Philharmonic, February 24, 2006

    The concert on Friday was spectacular.  Rather appallingly, Avery Fisher Hall seemed barely half full, and there were only 4 attendees in our row.  Even though the Harbison was difficult I would go almost anywhere to hear Dawn Upshaw, and I am surprised that the concert was not better attended.

    The opening work, Bartok’s fabulous Music for Strings, Percussion, and Celesta, was wonderfully performed, full of power and magic.  I don’t think the audience was thrilled.  A shame.  Perhaps I am biased because this is one of my favorite works,  it just makes me smile and want to dance.

    The Harbison was beautiful and powerful, the music was well suited to the gripping texts, and Ms. Upshaw, as usual, gave an affecting, riveting performance.  One of the things I love about Dawn Upshaw’s performances is that does not only does she have a great voice, but she sings with such intelligence, control, emotion, and a great ability to act and to portray the music through her singing.   Here’s a link to the review in the New York Times.

    That said, this work was difficult, or at least I found it so, and I tend to like difficult modern pieces  Of course the selected poems and fragments by Czeslaw Milosz are difficult in and of themselves.  The piece was beautiful, haunting, and very taxing.  I would not recommend it for anyone who wants to sit back and not think or feel strong emotions while listening to music.  I loved it but I don’t think I could listen to it often. I suppose that is why the concert hall was not full;  our last concert, an all Mozart program, was, after all, sold out.

    I don’t know why, I knew the name of the work before we came to the concert, but it must have been a symptom of the general fog in my brain of late, but I had not connected the name of the work "Milosz Songs" with Czeslaw Milosz’s actual works.  Stupid I know.

    The concert ended with Bernstein, some symphonic reworkings of dances from West Side Story.  I love West Side Story as a musical.  I have never developed a taste for symphonic renditions of other music forms and was not eager to hear this but we stayed.  It was nice enough, certainly a mental relief after the Harbison, and I suppose a nice way to send us off back into the streets and to bed.  No bad dreams after the Bernstein after all.

  • No rest for the weary

    There is nothing quite like emptying everything out of the sewing/fiber room/office to remind a person of all her weaknesses, excesses, sins and foibles.

  • Akris Spring 2006, part 1

    I was lucky enough to get the opportunity to examine a few
    Akris jackets in detail and take photos as well.

    First is a really lovely jacket from the Akris Premiere
    collection at Bergdorf Goodman. This
    jacket retails for $2990.00. The fabric
    is an interesting brown and taupe, two-tone woven fabric of linen, viscose, and
    polyurethane. The fabric is pretty firm
    and stable with a heavy drape, not stiff, but substantial-feeling. The front of the jacket and the sleeves are
    lined with bemberg rayon, and there is a half-lining in the back. I am not sure
    what kind of interfacing is used in the front of the jacket, there is none in
    back. The collars are probably
    fused. The fabric has little holes that
    allow light through where the gray/taupe thread is woven through the fabric and
    I see the lining clearly through the fabric and nothing else. I am confident that the fronts are not
    fused. There may be a small piece of
    hair canvas between the jacket and the shoulder pads.

    Akristaupe1

     

    The jacket is basically a princess cut. The front princess seam extends down from the
    armscye and has a dart at the bust. I have not actually found a lot of patterns
    for this style, Simplicity, Marfy, and Butterick each have one pattern in this
    style, but the darts are angled up from below the bustline.

     

    This Burda pattern, 8279, seems to be the closest I have found
    in the current catalogs.. The basic
    shape is similar. The dart looks pretty similar in the sketch (see jacket
    details below). One would have to modify
    the jacket to close at the center front line as there is no overlap and that
    might solve the problem of the collar opening being a little too low on this
    jacket. 

    Burda8279

    Notice the edges on the front, collar, and pockets. This is the same fabric, cut in bias strips,
    and wrapped over the edges. The bias
    strips are attached to the jacket fabric with a kind of flat-lock or cover
    stitch, I’m not really sure which because it is the same on both sides;
    possibly it was sewn twice, once from each side, although there may well be
    some stitch out there that gives this effect. I do not think it was serged separately and then sewn down, it looks
    like one stitch, finishing the edges of the binding and attaching it to the fabric
    at once.

    Akristaupe2

    Notice the finish on the in-seam pocket as well:

    Akristaupe4

    The jacket is closed with two large hooks and eyes, sewn on
    the inside of the jacket. They are not
    inserted in a seam as there is no seam here. Both hooks are just below the bust
    dart, about 2 inches apart

    Akristaupe3

    Notice that the dart is horizontal, not angled
    up, and how carefully it is placed along the horizontal line of the fabric and
    how well the fabric is matched at the seams below the bust dart. It is these
    little details that make the jacket special.

    Akristaupe5

    The edges are all finished with a simple Hong Kong Finish
    where the jacket is not lined.

    Akristaupe6

    The hem is interfaced.  My only problem with this jacket is the way it is hemmed.  See how big the stitches are?  I have an uncanny ability to rip hems out of garments while I am wearing them and this hem would not survive. 

    Akristaupe8